Proposal: AGV Council Compensation Calibration: Benchmark for Next Term & Startup-Phase Bonus

[CastleCapital]

Hi Paulo,

Thank you for your comment and concern.

As discussed in the Delegates Telegram chat, this proposal and vote are following the guidelines laid out in The Arbitrum DAO's Procedures .

@Entropy

For the purpose of clarity, if a proposal only seeks to modify an existing initiative, this voting requirement will not apply.

This has been confirmed by @Pruitt of @Entropy in the Delegates chat.

@paulofonseca

we’ve always followed the precedent of needing more than the 3% quorum to consider an offchain vote binding when changing an existing proposal. the last one was the DIP 1.7 for example.

In terms of your claim above, it should be noted that The Arbitrum DAO's Procedures define the fallback system. Each initiative (e.g., DIP) can set its own specific voting requirements, as occurred in the referenced proposal for DIP 1.7. This was also confirmed in the Delegates chat by @MinistroDolar of @SEEDGov.