For authors and/or key contributors of these proposals, it would be helpful if you could include a TL;DR of your proposal/discussion in the comments so delegates can review them and prepare their questions for the call.
Please comment below if there’s any update that you wish to share during the call.
Additional Notes
We prioritize all proposals and notable discussions that have more engagement.
The logic of the two weeks is that given the proposal lifecycle (one week on the forum, one week on Snapshot, and then two weeks on Tally). This means that even if a proposal goes through that shortest possible route, it will be covered at least at the proposal and the Tally stage or the Snapshot and the Tally stage.
For anything that needs a recap, they could be parked after these discussions
It was under the Off-Chain AIPs until it was cancelled and removed from Snapshot. The proposal has been covered in the past, while it was just on the forums. Happy to add it to the agenda again if there’s interest in it being discussed (cc @CastleCapital)
The original proposal will take a new path of two clear, sequential votes, each with an implemented quorum requirement in line with the DAO’s non-constitutional quorum.
Proposal A (Benchmark Calibration for Future Council Members) will be posted to Snapshot voting on Thursday, 16th October.