Instead of giving 1M tokens to the top 10, I think it is better to put a VP cap, so that everyone has the same VP. To avoid giving more VP to the one who has more. For example, everyone on the list should have 1M VP and based on that distribute the 10M.
After consideration, we agree with your suggestion on topping up VP to 1M rather than delegating 1M to each. We will add this revision to the draft.
Secondly, when it comes to assigning VP to each one and given that they have to have a minimum activity, which coincides with the delegate incentive program, I think that in order not to duplicate expenses in the reports, the metrics of the delegate program could be used. For example, if delegates do not reach +60% TP they could lose the assigned VP. This would not require additional reporting as they would be sent by the delegate incentive program and all the information would be in one place.
We agree that leveraging the ongoing delegate incentive program to the fullest extent possible is advisable. We are still finalizing KPIs but we intend to utilize the metrics of the delegate incentive program, such as delegate total participation (TP) requirements, to track the program’s success and hold program participants accountable. We also aim to provide transparent reporting to the DAO.