The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
After voting in the nominee selection phase, we’ve decided to equally split our voting power among the following nominees (in no particular order) during the election phase:
Immunefi
Immunefi is a very well-known, established, and respected security firm, which we felt is a great fit for the Security Council. They bring strong technical knowledge and a security-oriented mindset, which are much-needed qualities.
Dennison Bertram
As the CEO of Tally, Dennison not only has a strong technical understanding but is also very familiar with Arbitrum and its stakeholders. He’s plugged in with the community and he has a very solid understanding of the governance infrastructure.
Consensys Dilligence
Conesnsys is another security firm that we were comfortable supporting, knowing they possess the necessary skill set to be an effective member of the Security Council.
Dedaub
Dedaub, another well-known security firm, has previously worked with the DAO in the context of ADPC and the experience of working with them has been a pleasant one. Like other security firms, we believe they have the relevant skillset to fulfill their role as a member of the Security Council.
Caleb
Caleb comes from a very strong technical background and brings a lot of smart contract knowledge, having worked as an engineer at Etherscan. He has also served as a member of the Security Council in the previous cohort so he’s familiar with the whole process.
Halborn
Last but not least, Halborn is the 4th security firm that applied and passed the nominee election phase and for which we voted in favor. Similarly to the other security firms, we’re confident in Halborn’s ability to carry out the responsibilities of the Security Council.