Hey @Bernard,
The idea of directly incentivizing submissions has been discussed at length under the original SOS proposal.
In short, we believe that parties with vested interests (major ARB token holders, full-time contributors, protocols deeply tied to Arbitrum, etc.) are best positioned to propose objectives, as the growth of the ecosystem is directly tied to the aforementioned parties’ success.
Entropy has already begun collecting feedback from delegates and key stakeholders, which we’ll leverage to formulate our submission. From conversations with other contributors, we know that there are others currently doing the same. As such, we expect there to be several full-fledged submissions that incorporate a wide set of opinions.
Directly rewarding proposers is, in our opinion, likely to lead to a lot of noise and a situation where objectives are submitted to have them passed instead of what would be optimal for Arbitrum, so you run into a possible self-interest problem here as well.