Extension to the Revision Period
We want to begin by saying that we’ve been extremely happy with the number of objectives matrices submitted through organic engagement. The community has floated many great ideas, and it’s clear that a significant amount of care has been put into the submissions and related conversations—we want to make sure no effort goes unnoticed.
Having said that, in the past few days, Entropy has received feedback from delegates and key stakeholders expressing concerns around the clarity of ownership of current work streams and risk of efforts being duplicated, how the Foundation’s vision affects the SOS process and what the direct relationships between actors within the vision would look like, etc.
Several delegates have expressed to us that they aren’t comfortable voting on the current submissions, not because they think the submitted matrices are low-quality, but due to the overall unclarity of the next steps with respect to the DAO’s structure. Based on this information, we foresee with high certainty that this process will not reach the required consensus, and would therefore put unnecessary stress on delegates to go through the voting period and ensuing frictions.
As such, we’ll extend the revision period indefinitely, until there is more clarity around what the DAO’s operational structure will look like in the future. Entropy has been in contact with L2BEAT, and, in the meantime, they will be hosting a DAO call(s) to continue conversations regarding DAO-side objectives and the path forward.
If you have any questions or concerns, please shoot @BricksIntern a message on Telegram.