Posting here some voting rationales from votes in the last 30 days. I will work on being more consistent moving forward to ensure these are posted more regularly.
AIP: Raise the gas target, min L2 base fee, & implement improvements to the pricing algorithm
Vote: For
Voting for this technical improvement to reduce L2 gas price volatility. The proposed changes helps offset reduced congestion pricing revenue while discouraging spam.
John Kennedy reconfirmation for AGV council
Vote: Abstain
Abstaining due to insufficient personal context on this individual’s performance during his initial term as an AGV council member.
Tim Chang reconfirmation for AGV council
Vote: Abstain
Abstaining for the same reason as the Kennedy reconfirmation—insufficient personal context on the individual or their performance.
AGV Council Compensation Calibration: Startup-Phase Bonus for Current Council Members
Vote: Abstain
Abstaining because I lack the context and details needed to evaluate this additional compensation structure. I supported the benchmark calibration for future terms as it establishes standards going forward, but additional startup-phase bonuses for current members require clearer justification of amounts and deliverables.
The DAO Incentive Program (DIP 2.0)
Vote: Against
Voting against as I felt the proposal adds complexity while claiming simplification. I’d support a revised version as described here: Rewarding Active Delegates (RAD) Program - #4 by Sov
Note: These kinds of votes may affect my compensation as a delegate if passed
[Temperature Check] Should we try a Delegate Incentive Program like the Arbitrum Triple Dip?
Vote: Against
Voting against as I think we need straightforward compensation for voting participation and rationales, with contributor work funded through clear scope-of-work proposals.
Note: These kinds of votes may affect my compensation as a delegate if passed