Gi0rgos Delegate Communication Thread

Name : gi0rgos

ENS : gi0rgos.eth

Tally profile URL: Tally | delegate.gi0rgos.eth

Languages I speak and write: English, Greek

Key Areas of Contribution and Vision for the DAO :
As a delegate, I aim to contribute primarily in the areas of Improving Governance Participation and Supporting Infrastructure. One of my core interests is education - particularly, helping others understand complex systems through clear, accessible explanations. I believe that when people truly understand how a system works, they are far more likely to engage meaningfully with it. Education and onboarding are not side aspects of a DAO - they are foundational. If we want to build a truly human-centered DAO, accelerating the learning curve for new members is essential.

On a broader level, I view DAOs as an experiment in collective responsibility. For the Arbitrum DAO to thrive, we need to prioritize long-term thinking, build sustainable frameworks, and foster a culture where participation is driven not only by reward, but by belief in what we’re building together.

Voting Rationale :
My voting decisions are always grounded in the long-term sustainability and prosperity of the DAO. My intention is never to offend, nor to flatter any individual or group. With humility and honesty, I strive to vote for what I genuinely believe to be the best possible option for the collective good.
I vote on both Snapshot and Tally, and below I share my vote along with the rationale for each proposal. This thread will be updated periodically, so that any interested community member can easily access what I voted on - and why.
This thread reflects my personal views and judgment at the time of each vote. I remain open to revising positions as the DAO evolves.

Regarding the Arbitrum Audit Program my vote was FOR

As concerns the Hackathlon Continuation Program I voted only for the continuation of HCP and clicking the hyperlink leads to my rationale for this vote.

As concerns the AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto , this was the first time I found it hard to decide. I wish I had a developer to thoroughly discuss this proposal with. In the end, I went with a FOR vote, as I realized—based on the comments—that this proposal is in the best interest of the DAO.

Regarding the The Watchdog: Arbitrum DAO’s Grant Misuse Bounty Program , I voted FOR , although I do retain some considerations, not about the program itself, which, of course, can be seen in my comment.

As concerns the Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget, I voted FOR