Thanks for the great proposal. This is absolutely a very necessary oversight mechanism for Arbitrum DAO. However, I have a few concerns. First, I believe it’s necessary to clearly define the scope of “misuse,” and determining whether a violation has occurred should go through a more rigorous review process. Ideally, reviewers should publish a detailed report for the DAO to vote on. Without this, I worry there could be instances of power abuse, which would severely harm the DAO. Second, while stopping the disbursement of future funds in case of a violation is straightforward, recovering previously distributed funds could be more challenging. Considering participants are from various countries, legal avenues might not be effective. Happy to discuss!