We are voting FOR this proposal.
First, we want to thank the OAT and all contributors for their diligent work in incorporating community feedback and carefully refining the OpCo structure.
We are pleased to see that two of the primary concerns StableLab had when reading the proposal have been constructively addressed in the comments, namely transparency reporting and budget limitations:
While we do continue to hold some reservations about the reduced guardrails around conflict of interest management, particularly given the important role OpCo will play, we acknowledge that this tradeoff has been made thoughtfully to enable stronger candidate pools, attract specialized expertise, and accelerate operational ramp-up.
At this stage, with a highly capable OAT cohort now in place, broad alignment among major stakeholders, and a clear pathway toward full operationalization, we prefer to move forward with these changes if that will take us closer to enabling OpCo as a strategic execution arm of the DAO.