The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst, @Sinkas, and @Manugotsuka, and it’s based on their combined research, fact-checking, and ideation.
We are voting FOR the proposal.
While we understand the concerns raised by other delegates regarding the change to the OpCo’s original mandate, we do not share them. We’ve seen several initiatives in the past fall short and require additional clarification (e.g., the role of the DAO Advocate in the original ARDC, or the responsibilities of chairs in the MSS); therefore, we shouldn’t let the original proposal restrict us from proposing changes.
Furthermore, we believe that, at this stage, the OAT should have the flexibility to maximize the chances of OpCo’s success. However, we ask that the OAT and OpCo personnel ensure frequent and proper reporting back to the DAO so that we can keep track of what’s happening, raise concerns or issues in a timely manner, and correct course if needed.