Proposal: Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP) Council Voting
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 1, 2024
Vote: 25% Immutable Lawyer, 25% CoinflipCanada, 25% Devansh Mehta, 25% David Bolger
Reasoning: As the two members of the council that were already picked both have a BD background, we felt it was best to focus on another category. We are most familiar with the candidates in the governance section and made our choices based on observing past work done by the candidates. Though it falls outside governance, we also included David after some personal conversations.
Proposal: Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 1, 2024
Vote: For
Reasoning: We voted for this at the temp check stage but would like to see some more discussion and possible changes made to the proposal before it’s posted to Tally. We think the Entropy team is doing good work, and that retaining their services would be beneficial to the DAO. However, there are aspects of this proposal that we would like to see tweaked slightly. As other delegates have mentioned, we’re not sure that a full team of 10 people will be necessary. We don’t think Entropy will hire for the sake of it, but we think it could be good to have some lightweight mechanism for expansions to the team to be approved by the DAO. One possible option is to have a quick report from Entropy when they want to expand the team beyond specific breakpoints. Reports could be as simple as explaining what work the team is not able to do with their current capacity, and what they’re trying to get out of the next hire. These can be approved optimistically to allow Entropy the space to expand into roles that are clearly necessary, while still allowing the DAO a chance to evaluate whether the scope of Entropy’s work is appropriate and if additional members are truly needed.