Ultra Delegate Communication Thread

This is ultra’s delegate communication thread. It will be updated periodically.

1 Like

STIP Bridge Challenges Rationale:

  1. MUX: For, although they posted their application late, they re-adjusted and lowered their ask. I believe this time their metrics will be better.
  2. Stargate: For, I believe it will positively impact TVL bridged over to Arbitrum
  3. Solv: For, relatively small ask, it’s worth exploring how these incentives can impact their growth.
  4. Sanko Games: For, one of the most innovative and organic growth projects on Arbitrum. They deserve growth support.
  5. Tide: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results
  6. KyberSwap: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results
  7. Gains: For, I believe gains represents a big part of Arbitrum and should continue to be incentivised.
  8. Boost: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results + sybil
  9. Thales: For, their previous STIP was a success, its worth continuing to support.
  10. Savvy: For, relatively small ask, the concerns raised don’t seem worth not having this pass.
  11. Stake DAO: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results. Previous metrics quite concerning
  12. Furucombo: Against, poor usage of previous STIP funds + wash trading concerns
  13. Socket Bridge: Against, unclear handling of funds during previous STIP, unclear results and why this time it would be different.
  14. Angle: Against, poor results during first STIP and no meaningful change to address them
  15. OpenOcean: Against, agree with ARDC comments
  16. Thetanuts Finance: For, good performance and team addressed farming concerns.
  17. Dolomite: For, don’t personally see a problem with the incentives method used. oARB is a powerful tool.
  18. Umami: For, same as Dolomite.

Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)

Platform: Snapshot

Vote:

  1. FOR: Implement MSS and Reporting
  2. FOR: Implement MSS
  3. Against
  4. Abstain

Rationale: [RFC] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS) - #28 by 0x_ultra

Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: For

Rationale: Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties - #16 by 0x_ultra

Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: For

Rationale: Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives (UPDATED) - #40 by 0x_ultra

AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30)

Platform: Snpashot

Vote: For

Rationale: AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30) - #12 by 0x_ultra

AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30)

Platform: Snpashot

Vote: For

Rationale: AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30) - #23 by 0x_ultra

AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30)

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: For

Rationale: AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30) - #20 by 0x_ultra

Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: Against

Rationale: Proposal [Non-Constitutional]: Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund - #21 by 0x_ultra

[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: For [Full scope]

Rationale: [Non-Constitutional] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Venture Initiative - #14 by 0x_ultra

Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum

Platform: Tally

Vote: Against

Rationale: Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum - #202 by 0x_ultra

Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal

Platform: Tally

Vote: For

Rationale: Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal - #30 by 0x_ultra

ArbitrumDAO Contribution; Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights

Platform: Tally

Vote: For

Rationale: Proposal [Non-Constitutional]: Defending Open Source: A United Stand for Developer Rights and Software Freedom - #42 by 0x_ultra

Election of STEP Program Manager

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: steakhouse.financial 100%

Rationale: STEP Program Manager Applications - #16 by 0x_ultra

AIP: BoLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: For

AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Bond sentiment.

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: For

AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Operational cost sentiment.

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: For

Rationale: AIP: BOLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum - #58 by 0x_ultra

Pilot Stage – Treasury Backed Vaults research and development

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: Against

Rationale: I am voting ‘against’. The idea is actually interesting but some aspects and their potential outcome remain unclear. I think that the cost is too high and there is no adequate risk assessment.

Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives

Platform: Tally

Vote: For

Rationale: Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives (UPDATED) - #57 by 0x_ultra

[Non-Constitutional] Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: Against

Rationale: Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal - #40 by 0x_ultra