This is ultra’s delegate communication thread. It will be updated periodically.
1 Like
STIP Bridge Challenges Rationale:
- MUX: For, although they posted their application late, they re-adjusted and lowered their ask. I believe this time their metrics will be better.
- Stargate: For, I believe it will positively impact TVL bridged over to Arbitrum
- Solv: For, relatively small ask, it’s worth exploring how these incentives can impact their growth.
- Sanko Games: For, one of the most innovative and organic growth projects on Arbitrum. They deserve growth support.
- Tide: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results
- KyberSwap: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results
- Gains: For, I believe gains represents a big part of Arbitrum and should continue to be incentivised.
- Boost: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results + sybil
- Thales: For, their previous STIP was a success, its worth continuing to support.
- Savvy: For, relatively small ask, the concerns raised don’t seem worth not having this pass.
- Stake DAO: Against, I don’t believe incentivising will bring meaningful results. Previous metrics quite concerning
- Furucombo: Against, poor usage of previous STIP funds + wash trading concerns
- Socket Bridge: Against, unclear handling of funds during previous STIP, unclear results and why this time it would be different.
- Angle: Against, poor results during first STIP and no meaningful change to address them
- OpenOcean: Against, agree with ARDC comments
- Thetanuts Finance: For, good performance and team addressed farming concerns.
- Dolomite: For, don’t personally see a problem with the incentives method used. oARB is a powerful tool.
- Umami: For, same as Dolomite.
Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)
Platform: Snapshot
Vote:
- FOR: Implement MSS and Reporting
- FOR: Implement MSS
- Against
- Abstain
Rationale: [RFC] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS) - #28 by 0x_ultra
Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: For
Rationale: Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties - #16 by 0x_ultra
Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: For
Rationale: Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives (UPDATED) - #40 by 0x_ultra
AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30)
Platform: Snpashot
Vote: For
Rationale: AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30) - #12 by 0x_ultra
AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30)
Platform: Snpashot
Vote: For
Rationale: AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30) - #23 by 0x_ultra
AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30)
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: For
Rationale: AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30) - #20 by 0x_ultra
[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: For [Full scope]
Rationale: [Non-Constitutional] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Venture Initiative - #14 by 0x_ultra
Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum
Platform: Tally
Vote: Against
Rationale: Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum - #202 by 0x_ultra
Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal
Platform: Tally
Vote: For
Rationale: Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal - #30 by 0x_ultra
Election of STEP Program Manager
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: steakhouse.financial 100%
Rationale: STEP Program Manager Applications - #16 by 0x_ultra
AIP: BoLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: For
AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Bond sentiment.
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: For
AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Operational cost sentiment.
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: For
Rationale: AIP: BOLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum - #58 by 0x_ultra
Pilot Stage – Treasury Backed Vaults research and development
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: Against
Rationale: I am voting ‘against’. The idea is actually interesting but some aspects and their potential outcome remain unclear. I think that the cost is too high and there is no adequate risk assessment.
Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives
Platform: Tally
Vote: For
Rationale: Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives (UPDATED) - #57 by 0x_ultra
[Non-Constitutional] Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: Against
Rationale: Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal - #40 by 0x_ultra
Multisig Support Service (MSS) Elections
Platform: Snapshot
Votes and Rationale: [RFC] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS) - #53 by 0x_ultra
ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO
Platform: Snapshot
Vote: Against