Voicing all three vote opinions are below. As a general opinion, it is clear that a ton of work has been done on this project and plenty of feedback / discussion has been taken into account. It also seems to have been properly audited and a lot of through has been put into the economic side of things. I am excited to see Arbitrum continue to work towards being more decentralized as time goes on.
1. AIP: BoLD - Permissionless Validation for Arbitrum
Voting “For” as this is a clear upgrade in security and decentralization of the network. Reduction in delay attacks is a positive as well. No real reason to vote against this
2. AIP: Funds to Bootstrap the First BoLD Validator - Bond Sentiment
The Arbitrum Foundation is a trusted entity in regards to running the first BoLD Validator. I see no issue with the cost, and the ability of the DAO to clawback in the event of a bad actor is appreciated.
3. AIP: Funds to Bootstrap the First BoLD Validator - Operational Cost Sentiment
Agree that it is important to subsidize the first year in order to attract Validators to the network to further increase decentralization.
Edit: To save forum space, editing this post to state that my opinions remain unchanged for the Tally vote.
Edit 2: To save forum space, editing this post to state that my opinions remain unchanged for the Tally vote for the BoLD vote.