Name: Alice Corsini
Delegate Address: 0xb48f869838C2279173df54cFd5AdE888303b26ad
Tally Profile: Tally
Forum: @alicecorsini
Twitter: @alicecorsini_
Languages: English and Italian
This thread will provide transparency on the rationale to my votes as delegate.
Proposal: GovHack Devcon in Bangkok - Hack Humanity
Vote: Against
Reasoning: While I see the value in the GovHack initiative, I’d like to see it re-focused to either onboard new people to the Arbitrum DAO ecosystem or to effectively discuss carefully-selected topics and proposals.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget
Vote: For
Reasoning: I am in favour of funding the Arbitrum Foundation. They have a critical role for the success of the project and support a more hands-on approach on strategic partnerships on their side.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum DAO Delegate Incentive Program
Vote: For - DIP V1.5
Reasoning: I am in favour of extending the Delegate Incentive Program as a key element to encourage active participation in the ecosystem.
Proposal: [Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator
Vote: Whitelist Infura Validator
Reasoning: Infura is an established and battle-tested provider serving the Ethereum ecosystem since inception. For this reason, I am in favour of whitelisting Infura as a Nova Validator.
Proposal: Research on context and retention
Vote: For
Reasoning: I am in favour of this initiative as it doesn’t require additional budget. However, I see a partial overlap with the “From engagement to rewards” analysis published by SeedGov.
Proposal: An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO
Vote: For - use ENS txt records
Reasoning: Because this approach has been adopted by other large protocols, becoming an actual standard, I am in favour of adopting daoURI for Arbitrum DAO.
Proposal: UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship
Vote: Against
Reasoning: While I see the value of the Ethereum Protocol Attackathon, I think it should be sponsored by the Ethereum Foundation and I am against sponsoring it as Arbitrum DAO given its limited impact on the ecosystem.
Proposal: [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal
Vote: For
Reasoning: I am in favour of renewing the ADPC for an additional 6 months for them to continue the work they started. I would expect a more in-depth evaluation of their work and achievements at the end of the second mandate.
Proposal: Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock
Vote: For
Reasoning: I am in favour of extending the Time Lock as suggested.