- Proposal: Security Council Elections (March 2025)
- Voting type & platform: Onchain - Tally
- Vote: 100% for Michael Lewellen
- Reasoning: We voted 100% for Michael Lewellen. We had a few candidates in mind, but ultimately made our decision to only support Michael after participating in the last Friday call about the Security Council elections. We followed the guidance provided in the March 2025 Member Election Phase post about what makes a good candidate to decide whether or not to split our vote. Michael was one of the candidates we considered because of his background, and after the meeting we were much more convinced to support him than before, not only because we believe he fully meets those guidelines, but also because of what we heard and saw during the call about this candidate in particular, such as his communication skills and his good disposition to talk about sensitive issues in public, showing himself as a safe option to deal with security issues that may arise. In the end, we decided to fully support him and only him for the reasons mentioned above. We thank all the other candidates for applying and consider them all to be excellent candidates for the position.