November 2025 voting
Snapshot votings
AGV Council Compensation Calibration: Startup-Phase Bonus for Current Council Members
Vote: For
Similar to the previous vote for future council members, we are in favour of this proposal. Again, the main point is that we do think the compensation raise is not material compared to the theoretical role of the AGV council: supervise a 200M Arbitrum fund for a very difficult vertical, gaming. All other points also stand, such as comparison with the OpCo OAT. We also do believe that standing up AGV has likely been a demanding task with a very initial steep curve, and for this reason we do think this retroactive change is not only consistent with the one made for future council, but also necessary in relation to the work done so far.
AIP: Raise the gas target, min L2 base fee, & implement improvements to the pricing algorithm
Vote: For
Tim Chang reconfirmation for AGV council
John Kennedy reconfirmation for AGV council
Vote: For for Both
In the same way we supported the raise of previous council members, we are here to confirm both Tim and John as valuable members of AGV.
There is in our opinion still a lot to fix in this initiatives; we do recognise the improvements over time, and we want to trust the current committee that states that John and Tim are strategic for the fund.
Is quite easy to understand the why for Tim due to his experience in VC. For John, we have started to know him better in the last few calls held in the DAO, and our advice for him is to show himself more and allow us to learn what he does.
Tally votings
n/a