There are two positions (I decided to give 50% of votes for each):
Operations - here I would vote for
Entropy Adv. + Tamara
Entropy - an experienced team that is already working closely with Arbitrum
Communication -
Frisson
I liked the experience of organizing communications on calls and on his proposals
Votes:
50% - Entropy Adv. + Tamara
50% - Frisson
Platform: Snapshot
I carefully read the research proposals of each candidate and decided to vote for two (they both give interesting topics for research, 50% each):
I think the important topics are financial stability and attracting capital and projects to Arbitrum. The hourly rate is also important, it is acceptable for both projects.
Votes:
50% - PYOR Research
50% - Llama Research & Castle Capital
Platform: Snapshot
There is one option that I think is worthy of being a candidate: Nethermind
The rest either ask for a lot - up to $500 / hour, or are less experienced
Vote: 100% - Nethermind
Platform: Snapshot
There are only 2 candidates here:
OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits
Both are good options, OpenZeppelin made good reports in the previous v1 program
Votes:
50% - OpenZeppelin
50% - Trail of Bits
Platform: Snapshot
Previously, the voting took place in Snapshot, since then the conditions and budget have not changed.
Now on-chain confirmation and sending of funds
Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally
Previously, the voting took place in Snapshot, since then the conditions and budget have not changed.
Now on-chain confirmation and sending of funds
This is one of the most necessary initiatives in terms of financial stability
Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally
Overall, this is the general vision of Arbitrum - similar to what Lido has - a 1 and 2 year vision.
Now it will be possible to make a budget for the year, and not like now - just spend as much as we want.
This is not the plan itself, but the intention.
Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot
The proposal to become a sponsor of ETH Bucharest 2025
2 options:
What I don’t like:
Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot
There are 30 initiatives in progress, of which about 10 require ongoing management:
In total, all the main projects require $453,000 for management, and we are offered more than $4,100,000.
Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot
The vote consists of two parts:
After the Arbitration validation funds were allocated in August, it was time to launch BoLD - an updated version of dispute resolution.
Finally, after all the audits and checks, it was time to launch this update.
Infura has already gone through this procedure at the Snapshot stage, so this vote is only an on-chain confirmation.
Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally
Despite the slow development of the program, I support it and it certainly brings profit, based on Dune’s data.
What I expected from this proposal:
I will repeat once again - I really like this treasury and it seems to me that there should be an end goal for it. That is, we must decide what % of the total treasury will be in this program. And also in how many years we should come to this amount (and why so many years, why not immediately).
also, will there be something other than RWA? There are many more profitable options for placing funds for stables. I would like to see some analysis of allocating some share of funds in this direction.
I hope that in the near future the authors of this program will show their thoughts on the future of the program
Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot
I chose these candidates for the following reasons:
Vote: **FOR Gabriel, CastleCapital, Uhthred **
Platform: Snapshot
I chose these candidates for the following reasons:
Vote: FOR SEEDGov, FruteroClub, saas
Platform: Snapshot
Even though there is no big point in voting (we have 3 candidates for 3 positions), I will choose the 2 best candidates:
Vote: **FOR Juandi, ariutokintumi **
Platform: Snapshot
Even though there is no big point in voting (we have 2 candidates for 2 positions), I will choose the best candidate:
Vote: **FOR Erezedor **
Platform: Snapshot
Interesting topic: a bounty program for monitoring grants.
If you find that some project is simply stealing money or not doing it for its intended purpose, you will be given money for it.
Plus some percentage of the money returned from that project.
I think this is a good initiative.
Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot
Essentially, website support with all the necessary information.
Two big minuses:
Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot
By analogy with LIDO, goals for 1 and 2 years will be made.
A small form is ready for this, where everyone can send their goals with a detailed description.
Entropy will collect goals together and make a vote for these goals.
After this vote, there are 30 days to submit an application, and after the goal is accepted, it can be revised only after a year (but in exceptional cases, if some kind of fucked up thing happens, then it can be done earlier)
I like this initiative, but to be honest, I thought Entropy would put these goals up for voting. This option might be even better.
However, it is unclear how many competent and detailed goals there will be, since there are no incentives for this. It is worth thinking about, perhaps retrospectively.
Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot
Here they want to get 4 million dollars in salary for a job that now costs 500 thousand dollars.
There are detailed calculations in the thread above.
I still think that too high salaries spoil such a good proposal. The idea itself is good, but the abuse of salaries spoils everything.
Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Tally
We already commented on our vote at the Snapshot stage.
Since then, nothing has changed.
Even though I don’t agree with the amount (it should be higher), I agree with the program as a whole
Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally