Curia Delegate Communication Thread

[Curia]

Proposal: Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund

Vote: Against

Rationale:

@Curia

We have decided to vote against the proposal to create a sub-committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund. ADPC is already well-equipped and qualified to manage the fund, possessing a deep understanding of the ecosystem and strategic decision-making capabilities. Introducing a new sub-committee would add unnecessary overhead, delays, and complexity for a task intended to last only two months.

Proposal: AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30)

Vote: For

Rationale:

@Curia

We decided to vote in favor of this, as This will reduce the DAO’s administrative burden and streamline handling Nova fees. With clear benefits.

Proposal: AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30)

Vote: For

Rationale:

@Curia

Stylus significantly improves Arbitrum by supporting Rust, C, and C++, expanding the developer community, enhancing performance, reducing costs, and improving security, all while maintaining EVM compatibility. This fosters innovation without disruption, ensuring Arbitrum’s success. So we will vote FOR this proposal.

Proposal: AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30)

Vote: For

Rationale:

@Curia

We will vote in favor of the proposal. There is no reason for us to vote against as this standard will enhance user experience, security, and functionality by integrating account abstraction wallets into ArbOS 3.0, promoting innovation and more sophisticated wallet solutions within the Arbitrum ecosystem.