DAOplomats Delegate Communication Thread

January 2025

[Snapshot] Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0

Voted: FOR

The Cohort one was good so we were happy to support a second iteration of the program.

[Snapshot] Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - New Protocols and Ideas

Voted: Saurabh 75%, Gabriel 25%

Saurabh extensive experience from participation in Questbook’s DDA program as a grants manager would play a major part in this role among other things. We also voted for Gabriel as we are supportive of how they envision supporting DeFi projects.

[Snapshot] Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - Education, Community Growth, and Events

Voted: SEEDGov

SEED has shown much more alignment than any other group in this category, and with a strong plan on how they are looking to go about this role, we are in favor.

[Snapshot] Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - Dev Tooling on One and Stylus

Voted: Juandi

This was another easy one. We believe Juandi has handled this role well in DDA’s past iterations and has strong expertise so we are happy to support him once again.

[Snapshot] Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - Gaming

Voted: Flook

Gaming is somewhat a slippery slope considering we already have a body dedicated to leading this. However, we are confident Flook would still bring value here as they have deep experience and alignment within the community hence our support.

[Snapshot] The Watchdog: Arbitrum DAO’s Grant Misuse Bounty Program

Voted: FOR

We were supportive of this proposal. A well-defined structure like this would help optimize capital deployment to projects while curbing grant misuse at the same time.

[Tally] [Constitutional AIP] Activate Arbitrum BoLD + Infura Nova Validator Whitelist

Voted: FOR

We were in favor of each of the proposals on Snapshot so we maintained our support during the onchain vote.

[Snapshot] Proposal for Piloting Enhancements and Strengthening the Sustainability of ArbitrumHub in the Year Ahead

Voted: FOR without retroactive

ArbitrumHub has done good work so we supported funding them but without retroactive as we believe their ask should cover previous work done.

[Snapshot] Arbitrum Strategic Objective Setting (SOS) – Defining the DAO’s Interim Goals

Voted: FOR

We really liked the flexibility of this proposal as well as its importance to the community so we were fully in support.