Voting FOR this proposal. I think that this new approach is interesting to test, especially as it seeks to address identified issues from previous programs and tries to offer an alternative solution. What I appreciate here is that the asset specific approach means even smaller projects and users can participate making it more inclusive.
Regarding centralization concerns I think that in cases like this a certain degree of centralization can enable quicker interventions and in some cases greater effectiveness. However, since delegates are less directly involved in the decision-making process, I expect transparency and consistent reporting with clear and regular updates. I think that there’s always a difficult trade-off to make, but I believe that the balance relies on transparency.
That said, one thing I would appreciate seeing is a more detailed explanation or forecast of the cost breakdown, so we have a clearer idea of operational expenses.
I am curious to see how this approach will evolve and look forward to following its progress.