Name: s6k Labs
Wallet Address: 0x7A5e35d066B96BD8896f4EdC293607fbA64979d6
Tally Profile URL https://www.tally.xyz/profile/0x7a5e35d066b96bd8896f4edc293607fba64979d6
Website: https://www.s6klabs.com/
What area are you most interested in contributing to?
- NFT development on Arbitrum
- Gaming development on Arbitrum
- Improving Governance participation
how aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the goal of the DAO?
While we believe that liquidity mining can be a useful tool in certain cases, we do not necessarily view it as the primary goal of us. Our focus is on building and supporting robust, decentralized projects for the Arbitrum ecosystem.
Sample Voting Issue 1 - UniSwap/Flipside Bounty
How would you vote?
For.
I share the idea that delegation of voting power is necessary for any DAO to function efficiently in the long term
2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?
I would suggest amending a bit.
- First, I believe that the grants should be separated into quarterly distributions rather than being divided into Year 1 and Year 2. While I understand that half of the allocation was going to employing staff and they would prefer to have the reserve upfront, I think it would be wiser to have more frequent distributions to ensure greater accountability and oversight.
- Secondly, I would recommend introducing checkpoints across the delegation period to ensure that the DAO is comfortable with the allocation and to encourage increased accountability and accountability reports from the grantee. This would involve routine votes to review the progress of the program and to ensure that the allocation is being used in accordance with the DAO’s objectives.
- Overall, these amendments would help to increase transparency and accountability while still allowing for efficient delegation of voting power within the DAO.
Overall, these amendments would help to increase transparency and accountability while still allowing for efficient delegation of voting power within the DAO.
- How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?
This is a complex issue that requires careful consideration.
On the one hand, centralization can allow for quicker decision-making and more efficient execution of tasks. On the other hand, a more decentralized approach may be preferable, such as in situations where broad participation and input from stakeholders is needed to achieve long-term sustainability.
Ultimately, the specific approach will depend on the specific situation and the goals of the organization or project.
Sample Voting Issue 2:
Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
Split reimbursement may be the most reasonable option to consider. Users trust the protocol with their savings, and if it is hacked, a lack of reimbursement would be unethical. However, the amount of reimbursement should be carefully evaluated based on the extent to which the protocol was affected by the hack, as well as the operational costs required for the protocol to survive.
Languages I speak and write: English, Vietnamese
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest: No conflicts of interest