What is (Re)delegation Week? (+Application thread)

[Arbitrum]

What is (Re)delegation Week?

(Re)delegation Week will occur between July 17, 2024 and July 23, 2024.

It will serve as a period to strengthen active and decentralized delegation within ArbitrumDAO - by bringing awareness to the importance of participation, promoting diverse voices (through multiple AMA governance calls), and encouraging community members to (re)assess and (re)assign their voting power to representatives who best align with their values and vision for the DAO.

Check out this forum post to learn more about the role of delegates and delegators, and why you should consider becoming one…

Purpose of (Re)delegation Week

The purpose of this week is to boost active participation in the DAO’s decision-making process through effective (re)delegation.

Since its inception, the ArbitrumDAO has been one of the most active and decentralized DAOs in the Web3 ecosystem. There are ~436K delegators and ~260K delegates who have enabled the DAO to vote on over 280 Snapshot and 30 Tally proposals. However, to further decentralization and diversity, ArbitrumDAO needs to increase its number of active delegates.

Fast-forward to today, plenty of new contributors have become paramount in driving the DAO forward. However, many of these recent contributors have little-to-no delegation power and therefore, cannot significantly partake in decision-making. This is because most delegators delegated their voting power soon after the DAO’s inception, and may not have reassessed their delegations since. Additionally, the Arbitrum community has grown over the past year, meaning that many $ARB token holders have a significant amount of voting power that could, potentially, be delegated to active delegates.

Accordingly, (Re)delegation Week aims to enable these newer and active contributors to step up, make themselves heard, and potentially get more voting power to become more involved in governance.

The figures below reiterate the importance of (Re)delegation Week. As of July 1, 2024:

• ~10% of circulated $ARB is delegated (i.e. 90% is undelegated)
• ~35% of $ARB token holders are delegators (i.e. have delegated their voting power to themselves or to someone else)
• ~6% of circulated $ARB is actively used for voting (based on the percentage of $ARB used for Tally voting out of the circulating $ARB supply, in the past 3 months)

TL;DR: ArbitrumDAO needs enhanced voter activation, which can be enabled by:

• having more $ARB token holders (i.e. delegators and potential delegators) participate in governance by delegating their voting power to active delegates; and,
• having more delegates actively participate in governance.

Timeline

• Build up to (Re)delegation Week (Now till Jul 16, 2024)
  • There will be a governance call on July 15 at 14:30 UTC to discuss the perks and process of becoming a delegate. The meeting link can also be found in the ArbitrumDAO governance calendar
• Submission deadline (July 16, 2024):
  • To participate in (Re)delegation Week, by July 16, delegates should:
    • Complete their delegate profile on Tally, (including their chosen name and/or ENS handle), ideally use the Delegate Statement Template as outlined in this forum post, and make sure that the ‘Active delegate’ checkbox is selected when writing up your profile
    • Share a link to their profile to confirm their participation in (Re)delegation week, and specify their preferred AMA timeslot(s), as a comment below. Re(delegation) Week AMA timeslots are as follows:
      • July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC
      • July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC
      • July 22, 16:00-17:00 UTC
      • July 23, 13:00-14:00 UTC
    • Share their profile as a comment on the Delegate Statement Template forum post, and follow the suggested template guidelines
    • Further guidance on how to become a delegate can be found here → How to Become a Delegate
• (Re)delegation Week (July 17 and July 23, 2024):
  • During this period, there will be multiple AMA governance calls (as listed above) for delegates to pitch why they would make a good delegate, and illustrate their values and vision for ArbitrumDAO. The meeting links can also be found in the ArbitrumDAO governance calendar

Key Terms

• Token holders: Members of the Arbitrum community who hold the $ARB token
• Delegate: A party that can vote on Arbitrum Governance proposals. Could be an $ARB token holder or someone to whom other $ARB token holders have delegated their voting power
• Delegator: A party who assigns their voting power to someone else, to vote on their behalf
• Voting Power: The sum of $ARB tokens held by a token holder

Resources

• Delegate on Tally
• Delegate Statement Template
• Delegate or Become a Delegate
• Delegates and Delegation: A Conceptual Overview
• How to Vote on ArbitrumDAO Governance Proposals
• How to delegate your voting power: A guide for $ARB token holders
• How to become a delegate
• How to build a strong delegate platform
• Delegate Announcements Telegram channel
• ArbitrumDAO Governance Calendar

[Larva]

larvandweb3.eth's Delegate Profile

July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

[ocandocrypto]

Hey Arbitrum DAO,

I’d like to participate in this initiative. Over the past six months, I have actively contributed to the Arbitrum DAO, writing the “Arbitrum DAO News” weekly and participating in the Onboarding Working Group.

Also, from Web3 Citizen we wrote The State of DAOS 2023 and Arbitrum DAO Hub and Guide tu understand better the governance framework.

My aim is to support projects and proposals that are focused on the long-term ecosystem of Arbitrum such as ROI and sustainability. From bringing new contributors, projects, and initiatives that define this.

ocandocrypto.eth's Delegate Profile

I will be preparing for the call and sharing more with you.

Also, I would love to participate in any of these calls:

• July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC
• July 22, 16:00-17:00 UTC
• July 23, 13:00-14:00 UTC

[Djinn]

DAO enjoyers, throwing my hat in for the Redelegation effort.

I’ve worked hard with the DAO to make sure we have a good balance of strategic bets and smaller support mechanisms for builders, and hope to earn your delegation.

Contributions:

• STIP Backfund (co-author)
• LTIPP (initial draft)
• STIP Extension (contributor)
• VCDAO (initial draft)
• Gaming Catalyst Program (author)

Arbitrum has a unique path to becoming the gold standard of decentralized organizations, and I want to help us drive towards the future.

Djinn's Delegate Profile

Preferred AMA slots:

• July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC
• July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

Delegate Thread

Djinn

0xBF122Ac9eE2cDd537fe404ADe218159051Ba9455

Djinn's Delegate Profile

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

• DeFi development on Arbitrum
• Gaming development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

#1 Equipping the DAO with an overall vision and strategy, while remaining decentralized

I believe that the best path forward for Arbitrum’s DAO to become a leader in governance, sustainability, and network market share is to equip the DAO and stakeholders with the right processes and frameworks to pursue a unified vision + strategy. However, this may require forms of centralization that tend to conflict with the decentralized upside we see from our current DAO structure.

It’s an interesting challenge, and something that I believe will be a key differentiator among competitors.

#2 Creating a culture that supports innovation and collaboration

DAOs are chaotic, and often come with the potential to fragment among members across philosophical, business objective, and other differences.

I strive to help contribute to the DAO so we can create a culture that can enable curiosity, logical critique, and excellence across the many academic, technical, operational, and strategic initiatives that we pursue now and into the future.

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

• Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.
• For instance, Flipside had 3/7 seats on the allocation committee and 1/3 seats on the Oversight committee. There was also concern since none of the other analytics service providers were involved in the proposal.
• This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.

Prompts to Answer:

1. How would you vote?
   Against
2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any? I would ask to remove all but one of Flipside’s allocation seats and remove Flipside from all oversight capabilities.
3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done? I think this issue is more about conflict of interest, but it is ultimately up to the DAO to come to an agreement on our overall stance between centralization and output.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview:
Overview Link 1
Overview Link 2

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.

Prompts to Answer:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

1. Full Reimbursement
2. No Reimbursement
3. Split Reimbursement

This is tough. I would lean towards Full Reimbursement, to remain consistent with the temp check. However, long term wise, we need to decide on policy and precedent on hacks / exploits and how to address the issue at hand. We need to avoid one off solutions and carefully evaluate impacts / risks / opportunities that come from our decided actions.

Languages I speak and write: English, Chinese

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
I am currently involved with the following protocols and initiatives:

• Vela Exchange (Advisor, co-founder)
• GCP (working group)
• Umoja (Advisor)
• Mainline Intelligence (Advisor)

[JoJo]

I really cannot not participate to this one.

JoJo here, your friendly arbitrum cow, willing to participate to this awesome initiative.
Over the past 10 months I have participated to a lot of programs, especially in grants, as well as in most of the forum discussion. Some key contributions:

• Questbook Season 1, domain allocator for the domain “new protocols and ideas”
• Uniswap Arbitrum Grant Program, committee member
• LTIPP advisor
• Stip.b advisor
• Questbook Season 2, domain allocator for the domain “new protocols and ideas”
• Member of the interim committee of GCP.

I am a native Arbitrum builder, and I have been involved in governance since September 2023. I am here to stay, and to do what I can to improve our DAO, and to make it the best place for both builders and users.

As a further reference, the karma dashboard also clearly shows that I am one of the most active delegate. If this is a good or a bad thing, I’ll leave it up to you to decide.

JoJoTheCow's Delegate Profile

Preferred AMA slots:

• July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC
• July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

[Curia]

We, Curia, would like to participate in this initiative. We have been active participants in Arbitrum since the DAO launched and are dedicated to continuing our contributions. Additionally, we are one of the most active delegates on Arbitrum, as shown on the Karma dashboard for both on-chain and off-chain activities.

@Curia

Name: Curia (organization)

ENS: curia-delegates.eth

Tally Profile URL: Tally.xyz Curia Profile

---

What area are we most interested in contributing to?

• Improving Governance participation
• Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

Our foremost objective for the Arbitrum DAO is to foster sustainable growth, decentralization, security, and transparency, while nurturing a diverse and inclusive community. To achieve this, we are committed to enhancing governance participation and bolstering protocol decentralization through our research, experience, and innovative solutions. This will enable the DAO to make well-informed decisions and effectively attain its goals.

For example, we offer data analysis to provide evidence supporting the SafeDAO token utility proposal, empowering the community to make informed decisions. Additionally, we have access to resources from a leading venture builder in Southeast Asia, which will greatly aid our efforts in contributing to and guiding the development of Arbitrum DAO.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

• Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.

Our Take:

1. How would you vote?
   Against
2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?We suggest the following amendments:

• Adjust the allocation committee to be comprised of more neutral parties with strict term limits and responsibilities, ensuring a fairer and less centralized process.
• Separate the grants into quarterly distributions to enhance accountability and reduce the risk associated with large allocations delivered only once a year.
• Establish clear KPIs for better assessment of the program’s success, rather than relying on vague transparency dashboards and committees.
• Introduce checkpoints throughout the delegation period, encouraging routine votes and increased accountability from the grantee. This would ensure the DAO remains comfortable with the large allocation and promote transparency through regular reporting.
• Break this proposal into multiple smaller proposals, covering aspects such as committee members, a grant proposal for Community-Enabled Analytics for Flipside, and guidelines on treasury funds management. This approach would avoid confusion and help voters better assess the proposal’s merits and drawbacks.

3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

We advocate for progressive decentralization, viewing decentralization as a journey rather than an abrupt shift. Starting with complete decentralization can hinder decision-making efficiency, but gradually implementing strong governance frameworks can streamline the process. It takes time to establish elements such as proposal timelines, resource allocation framework, and process feedback loop, which help create a decentralized protocol that operates efficiently, transparently, and trustlessly.

A DAO should consider centralizing certain aspects when specialist knowledge and quick decision-making are required, which might be challenging for the broader DAO community. In such cases, trusted members with relevant expertise should be appointed to act on the DAO’s behalf.

While we believe that protocols should work towards decentralization, it is crucial to do so sustainably, ensuring that the protocol or DAOs remains efficient and resilient against potential exploitation. We look forward to supporting DAOs on its journey towards sustainable decentralization, striking a appropirate balance between centralization and decentralization at each stages, promoting effective decision-making and broad participation.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview: FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement

Our take:
Full reimbursement - Handling reimbursement after a hack is a complex matter that requires a case-by-case assessment. When determining whether to distribute reimbursement, various factors should be considered, including the hack’s preventability, the parties bearing the cost of reimbursement, the potential impact on the protocol’s viability, the protocol’s plans post-hack, the DAO treasury’s size, and alternative reimbursement methods, such as revenue sharing to gradually repay affected parties.

In the first snapshot proposal, many of these questions were left unanswered, leading to potential uninformed decision-making that could be detrimental to the DAO. Given that Rari eventually deprecated their governance and protocol, it seems reasonable to utilize any remaining funds to compensate those affected. Nevertheless, this process must be approached with caution, taking into account the order and assets in which people are reimbursed. Moreover, if the available funds cannot cover all affected parties, the DAO should determine whether to fully compensate some users, distribute the funds evenly, or allocate them proportionally.

In situations like these, it is crucial to explore all options and maintain transparency with information. This approach enables voters to better understand the circumstances and make educated decisions, ultimately leading to more favorable outcomes.

Languages I speak and write: English & Thai

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

As a governance and DAO research team, we work with several other projects and DAOs such as SafeDAO and Optimism to enhance their governance and decision-making processes. We are committed to maintaining transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest in our work with the Arbitrum DAO. When required, we will disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in the course of our engagement.

You can find our delegate profile: Curia's Delegate Profile

Preferred AMA slots:

• July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC
• July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

[jameskbh]

I would like to participate in this initiative. I have been an active delegate, as you can see on the Karma dashboard.

Here is my Tally profile

I would like a slot on this day: * July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

[Arbitrum]

Thank you to all those who have expressed interest in (Re)delegation Week so far.

Just in case you haven’t already, it is highly recommended that you use the Delegate Statement Template on your Tally profiles, so that any potential delegators have a better understanding of your views and values as a delegate.

[danimim]

Awesome initiative. I’d love to participate. I have been an active delegate and bringing nice proposals and initiatives with Blockful.

I’d love to have a slot on * July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

danimim.eth's Delegate Profile

[kuiclub]

亏club's Delegate Profile

Dear Arbitrum Community Members,

Hello! I’m kuiqian.eth from Asia. I’m excited to join this (Re)delegation Week meeting. As a long-term active governance delegate, I support Arbitrum’s outstanding decentralization and community engagement. However, we need to improve transparency, efficiency, and incentives to attract more contributors and enhance community interaction.

Although I’m from a non-English speaking country, I will continue to actively participate in DAO governance to help our community thrive. Thank you!

• July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

[Vertex_Protocol]

If there is still space after the newer contributors, we would like to participate in this as well.

This is our Tally profile with our delegate statement.

Would prefer to have a slot on July 22, 16:00-17:00 UTC , with July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC as a secondary choice.

[X_0001]

The Treasure Arbitrum Council (ARC) confirms our interest to participate in (Re)delegation Week.

We have been committed members of the Arbitrum DAO since its formation (as well as before then as early builders on the Arbitrum network). We have maintained a high level of engagement with the DAO throughout the governance process, and being involved in the genesis and discussion of some major initiatives. We are focused on advancing both TreasureDAO and Arbitrum DAO with a strong interest in gaming, growth and users, and look forward to continuing to contribute to Arbitrum DAO at-large.

Delegate Profile
Original Delegate Statement
ARC Delegate Communication Thread

Our preference for the AMA would be July 17 1500 UTC+5

[Frisson]

Hey Arbitrum,

As a long-time delegate and contributor to the DAO, I’m excited to participate in (Re)delegation Week.

Frisson's Delegate Profile

AMA availability:

• July 22, 16:00-17:00 UTC
• July 23, 13:00-14:00 UTC

Cheers,

Frisson

[EzR3aL]

Hello,

as a new delegate in the ArbitrumDAO I would like to take part.

ezr3al.eth's Delegate Profile

Preffered timeslot:
July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC

[Griff]

I am excited to continue being part of the decentralization of the Arbitrum protocol as a influential Arbitrum delegate.

I am as OG of a DAO guy as anyone can be & active participant in many DAOs across the ecosystem, especially Optimism, ENS, Gitcoin, and Giveth as well as have strong connections in the Polygon ecosystem. This gives me perspective that I believe adds a lot of value in the Arbitrum Ecosystem.

My goals as a delegate:

• Fight conflicts of interests issues
• Reduce ARB spending (more no votes!)
• Use vesting more in payouts to align interests
• Add token utility to ARB

If you are aligned with these goals, I am a good delegate to support:

Griff Green 🙏🌱🎗💜's Delegate Profile

[WintermuteGovernance]

Wintermute is excited to participate in Arbitrum’s (Re)delegation Week!

We launched our Arbitrum Delegate Platform in May, signalling our long-term public governance commitment to the DAO. We are currently a Council Member on Arbitrum’s LTIPP and look forward to increasing our contributions as both a Delegate and Community Member.

Preferred AMA Slot:
July 23, 13:00-14:00 UTC

Our Tally profile can be found here: Tally | Wintermute Governance

Our Delegate Platform can be found here:

@WintermuteGovernance

Name: Wintermute Governance

ENS: wintermutegovernance.eth

Tally Profile URL: Tally | Wintermute Governance

Hi Arbitrum Community,

We are excited to publicly announce our Arbitrum Delegate Platform and begin supporting the Arbitrum ecosystem in our fullest capacity! We have been an early user and supporter of Arbitrum and our Delegate Platform represents our ongoing efforts to empower Arbitrum’s decentralization and growth.

At Wintermute, we believe that a decentralized world needs robust and progressive governance systems. Our goal is to support DAOs along their journey towards such a state through objective, long-term value-add decision-making.

Our Core Values:

Long-term value creation over short-term opportunism.

For example, we do not support short-term rent-seeking token distribution programs; or the redistribution of tokens that carry no positive second-order effects.

In contrast, we do support and encourage purpose-driven mechanisms that incentivize positive behaviour and are value-maximizing; or that improve alignment between token holders and the protocol.

Transparency, alignment, and proactivity.

We are proactive in providing clear and consistent reasoning behind our decision-making and proposals, ensuring the protocol’s sustainability is at the heart of all governance discussions.

Objective data-driven decision-making.

We use data and research to ensure our final decision is objectively value-accretive for the protocol.

By becoming a delegate we hope to support Arbitrum and have an impact in fostering a user-focused, neutral, sustainable, and inclusive ecosystem.

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

• DeFi development on Arbitrum
• Improving Governance participation
• Supporting Infrastructure

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

• Fostering Innovation, Human Capital & Ecosystem Growth (i.e., Empowering Decentralization!)

The Arbitrum Community has done a fantastic job at cultivating an ecosystem of diverse contributors that are hungry to provide value to the DAO. Such efforts have transpired into successful growth and development programs and we feel its extremely important for the DAO to remain vigilant in finding and supporting great human capital and providing them with the resources they need to innovate and grow.

• Safety, Security, and Inclusiveness of Users & Developers

Users & Developers are the lifeblood of the Arbitrum ecosystem and great emphasis should be placed on creating an inviting and safe environment.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

Vote: Against

What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

The proposal suffered from a myriad of misalignments and unnecessary complexity and overhead. We’d recommend the following amendments:

• Eliminate any form of active fund management

We understand the appeal to try and offer cost-free grants through yield-generation strategies, however, it introduces much more complexity, smart contract risk, and price risk which could all lead to adverse situations leaving the DAO with fewer funds.

• Eliminate the Oversight Committee

We agree that there is a clear conflict of interest with Flipside being on the Oversight Committee, but, in all honesty, 3 members should not be making a $10M decision on behalf of the DAO. Instead, the proposal should have aimed to request renewal from the DAO after 1 year assuming the program was successful.

• Reduce the number of Flipside Allocation Committee members to 1

One Flipside member would be sufficient for the Allocation Committee, this would’ve provided them with a way to tee up transactions and then have the remaining Committee members approve it if it’s in line with the intended purpose of the proposal.

How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

Centralization of authority is not necessarily a bad thing as we have noticed great success come from working groups. It ultimately comes down to the DAO trusting the relevant parties and the size of approved funds will simply be a function of this. Trust is built through reputation, relationship, and context, and it’s very unlikely that less reputable actors will be trusted with large amounts of DAO funds.

In saying this, we always think it’s a good idea (where possible) to implement a mechanism for the DAO to claw back funds if necessary.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?

Vote: Full Reimbursement

If possible, users without a doubt should be offered full reimbursement. Partial reimbursement can be offered alongside for users who want to increase their stake in the future of the protocol and have the belief that the protocol can recover from the hack.

Languages I speak and write:

English, Spanish, Russian, and many more.

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

Wintermute is an investor and user of many DeFi-related products and protocols that pose potential conflicts of interest. We aim to make appropriate disclosures and remove ourselves from certain decision-making scenarios where necessary.

[Tane]

Hi Arbitrum contributors and community members,

At Tané, we are excited to participate in (Re)delegation Week as we have been active in the DAO governance and contribute to the discussions on the forum and offline meetups.

Delegate Statement Template

Name Tané (Organization) Wallet Address or ENS tanegov.eth | 0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7 Tally Profile https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/delegate/0xb79294d00848a3a4c00c22d9367f19b4280689d7 What area are you most interested in contributing to? Improving Governance participation Supporting Infrastructure Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO Intro to Tané Tané is formed with a group of crypto-native product builders, based in Tokyo, Dubai and New York. We are b…

AMA preferred slot:

• July 22, 16:00-17:00 UTC

Looking forward to sharing what we value and have been working on.

[duokongcrypto]

Reply

I would like to participate in the AMA session during (Re)delegation Week
on July 17, 2024. Here are my delegate details:

Delegate Profile: kuiqian.eth

I look forward to discussing my vision and values for ArbitrumDAO governance. My spoken English is not very good as I am from Asia, but I have been a strong supporter of the ARB governance ecosystem. Can I still participate? Thank you!

丰密kuiqian.eth's Delegate Profile

[CastleCapital]

Castle Capital is excited to join this initiative!

As an Arbitrum-native community we have participated in the ecosystem through research and our involvement in governance.

First, informally with our comments on the STIP, which resulted in over 12m ARB saved from the program, and then formally as:

• LTIPP Advisors
• STIP Bridge Advisors
• Signer on the DAO Multi-Sig Service (MSS)

We are committed to strengthen our contribution to the Arbitrum DAO and increase our participation in governance as a Delegate.

Delegate Profile:

Castle Capital's Delegate Profile

Original Delegate Statement Template:

Delegate Statement Template

Name (organization or individual): Castle Capital (organisation) Wallet Address or ENS: castlecapital.eth (arb) Tally Profile URL: Tally | Atomist What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags: DeFi development on Arbitrum Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO: eg — how aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the goal of the DAO Supporting technical upgrades to the ecosystem Incentiv…

Preferred AMA Slot:

July 17, 15:00-16:00 UTC
July 19, 12:00-13:00 UTC

[karpatkey]

As an existing Arbitrum delegate, we are excited to continue being part of Arbitrum’s decentralization.

We at karpatkey are active participants in leading DAOs across the industry, including Aave, Uniswap, ENS and Gnosis. In Arbitrum, we serve as delegates and have contributed to the STEP program as well as the Treasury and Sustainability Working Group. We regularly engage in forum discussions, in-person meetups and 1:1 feedback loop conversations with other delegates. More recently, we presented a Strategic Treasury Management proposal to the Arbitrum DAO.

Our Tally profile: Tally | governance.karpatkey.eth

Our vision and values for Arbitrum.

AMA preferred slots:

• July 19th
• July 23rd