Rivan
0x6e07362663d422D76AeEe5264871450d93a65CE2
I’m interested in contributing to :
- DeFi development on Arbitrum
- Supporting Infrastructure
How aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the goal of the DAO?
- We should be extremely aggressive in liquidity mining if we want to maximize our potential for growth and success as a DAO. Liquidity mining is a powerful tool for attracting liquidity and users to our decentralized protocol, and by taking an aggressive approach, we can gain a significant advantage over our competitors.
The goal of the DAO should be to become the dominant player in the market, and liquidity mining is one of the key strategies we can use to achieve that goal. By aggressively incentivizing liquidity providers with high yields, we can quickly build a large and active community of users and investors, which in turn will drive adoption and usage of our protocol.
Of course, there are risks associated with aggressive liquidity mining, such as impermanent loss and price volatility. However, by carefully designing our incentive structures and monitoring the market closely, we can minimize these risks and ensure that our aggressive approach is both sustainable and effective.
While it’s important to be aggressive in our liquidity mining strategies, we must also be proactive in mitigating the risks associated with such an approach. One of the main risks of liquidity mining is impermanent loss, which can significantly impact the value of our token and erode investor confidence.
To avoid this risk, we should consider implementing a range of solutive measures. For example, we could use a dynamic pricing mechanism that adjusts rewards based on the level of liquidity and trading activity in our protocol. This would help to ensure that rewards are always in line with the actual value being added by liquidity providers, minimizing the risk of impermanent loss.
Additionally, we could implement a range of risk management tools, such as stop-loss orders and hedging strategies, to protect our liquidity pools from sudden price fluctuations. This would help to ensure that our liquidity providers are not exposed to undue risk, and would help to maintain stability in our protocol over the long term.
Ultimately, the goal of the DAO should be to strike a balance between aggressive liquidity mining and risk mitigation. By being aggressive in our pursuit of liquidity and growth, but also proactive in managing the risks associated with this approach, we can build a strong and sustainable decentralized protocol that attracts liquidity and users over the long term.
In short, if we want to achieve our goal of dominating the market, we must be aggressive in our liquidity mining strategies and relentlessly pursue growth and success as a DAO.
Sample Voting Issue 1 :
-
Againts
-
Increase the number of seats on the allocation committee to include more members from the Uniswap community, rather than giving the majority of the seats to Flipside crypto. This would help to ensure that decisions are made in a more democratic and decentralized manner.
- Include other analytics service providers in the proposal to foster competition and innovation. This would ensure that the program is not biased towards a single service provider and would allow for a more diverse range of perspectives and ideas.
- Ensure that the Oversight committee has a fair representation of members from the Uniswap community, rather than giving the majority of seats to Flipside crypto. This would help to ensure that there is sufficient oversight and accountability for the program.
- Provide more transparency in the allocation of UNI to bounties by publishing regular reports on the program’s progress and outcomes. This would help to build trust and confidence in the program and ensure that it is operating in a fair and equitable manner.
- The tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done is a complex issue that depends on the specific context and goals of the project or organization. In some cases, centralization of authority may be necessary to make quick decisions and take decisive actions, while in others, decentralization may be more appropriate to ensure a fair and democratic decision-making process.
In the case of Uniswap, which is built on the principles of decentralization and community governance, it is important to strike a balance between centralized authority and community involvement. While it may be tempting to give a single service provider control over the allocation of UNI to bounties to get things done quickly, this would go against the principles of decentralization and could lead to a concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or groups.
o strike a balance between centralization and community involvement, it is important to ensure that decision-making processes are transparent, inclusive, and involve input from a broad range of stakeholders. This could involve the establishment of a diverse allocation committee and oversight committee that includes representatives from various sectors of the Uniswap community, as well as the publication of regular reports on the program’s progress and outcomes.
In summary, the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done is a delicate balance that needs to be carefully considered in the context of the specific project or organization. In the case of Uniswap, it is important to prioritize decentralization and community involvement while still ensuring that decisions are made efficiently and effectively.
Sample Voting Issue 2 :
3. Split Reimbursement:
- Where affected receive some amount of compensation, but not the full amount lost. This approach could strike a balance between addressing the harm caused by the hack and avoiding the potential negative consequences of full reimbursement. However, determining the amount of compensation to be paid and the criteria for eligibility could be challenging, and it may still raise concerns about rewarding risky behavior.
However, it is worth noting that the decision to reimburse parties affected by an exploit is often a complex and contentious issue, as it can have significant financial, legal, and reputational implications for the organization. Some argue that reimbursement can help mitigate the damage caused by the exploit and restore trust in the affected parties, while others contend that it sets a precedent for rewarding irresponsible behavior and undermines the integrity of the system.
Languages i speak and write : Bahasa Indonesia & English.
Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
it is important to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise.
if our organization have a financial stake in the success of a particular project or proposal, it is important to disclose this information to other delegates and stakeholders. Similarly, if i have any other affiliations or relationships that may create a conflict of interest, such as serving on the board of a related organization or holding a position in a competing project, it is important to disclose this information as well.
By disclosing potential conflicts of interest, i can demonstrate my commitment to transparency and integrity and help to ensure that the governance process operates in the best interests of advancing the Arbitrum ecosystem.
