Delegate Statement Template

Governance Delegate Statements
,
1046

Name (organization or individual)
Giantape

Wallet Address or ENS
0xa00685c1e5dcc40cf6b70f254c50a81774da31dc

Tally Profile URL: Tally | 0xa006...31dc

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags ?

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • Improving Governance participation

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Against
  2. No amendments, just cancel it altogether.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

  • Full Reimbursement
  • Full reimbursement should always be given if the hack was not caused by the users’ failure to complete the security steps or if there was no fault on their part. Even if the users are at fault, it is still the fault of the project. Users should also be forced to take the necessary security measures. In this example, a full refund should be given because the project was hacked in general.
1 Like
1047

name thodoris triantafillou
Wallet Address or ENS 0x3cF3a4b9bd2143e28aeB9F7F22367503a29B806D
Tally Profile Tally | 0x3cF3...806D

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:

  • Public Goods funding
  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • Improving Governance participation
  • Supporting Infrastructure

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
First and foremost, the purpose of a DAO is to allow for the healthy and decentralised development of the rollup. Community-managed When enacting anything through governance, it is important to consider: How will this impact the long-term sustainability of the project.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. How would you vote?
    against
  2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

Diversity of opinions and participants should be the main objective of a DAO, if a small group centralizes power, the name DAO is only an aggregate.

Something that can help is to predefine in the beginning the creation of committees and delimit the members it should have at the expense of increasing diversity against personal interests.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
3. Split Reimbursement

A DAO must ensure the best environment for its members and also take into account their survival, therefore it will depend a lot on the cases and the type of hack, by literally draining their funds I do not think they can pay.

That’s why I think the best thing to do, and depending on the case like FEI, is to return money to those affected, maybe under a vesting system or the DAO can get down to work to look after the interests of its users.
Languages I speak and write:
greek and english

1049

Name: David Mihal

Wallet Address or ENS: mihal.eth

Tally Profile URL: Tally | mihal.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

  • Supporting Infrastructure
  • Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

I believe liquidity mining is unnecessary on a chain like Arbitrum that already has a strong DeFi ecosystem.

I believe any token distributions should be used to incentivize the development of L3s on top of Arbitrum, as well as licensing of the Arbitrum technology (which will drive value to the Arbitrum DAO).

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

Prompts to Answer:

  1. How would you vote?
    For

  2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

No ammendments.

  1. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

To strike a balance between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done, organizations should delegate tasks, establish clear roles and responsibilities, and create efficient decision-making processes. This approach can maximize efficiency while maintaining decentralization principles. By continuously evaluating and adapting the organizational structure and processes, organizations can leverage the benefits of decentralization, such as increased trust, collaboration, and innovation, while maintaining overall competence and integrity.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

I would have voted for full reimbursement, as I believe the DAO has an obligation users to do whatever is possible to prevent user loss of funds.

Languages I speak and write:

English y Espanol

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

None

2 Likes
1050

Name: obayang

Wallet:0xeFf35257182B01517818717631D81bD902939EBE

Tally: Tally | 0xb9dD...Ed61

Areas of interest:

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
I think the core purpose of the DAO is the consensus of the decentralized development and health.Community do anything or decisions need to consider sustainability.

Sample Voting Issue 1

Sample Voting Issue 2

Languages I speak and write: English, Chinese

1051

Name : Parvinder Singh Rakhra

Wallet Address : 0xa538E5f1Ac081a8C04D13C25a9D9c6c6A3C08C0E

Tally Profile URL Tally | 0xa538...8C0E

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

Public Goods funding

Improving Governance participation

Supporting Infrastructure

Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
eg — how aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the goal of the DAO?
Please share your stance on issues that were raised previously, in other communities, as described below:

Sample Voting Issue 1:

For

I propose each bounty to be voted on with a snapshot, and hard caps on each bounty equal.

It’s important to frame the choices to the community as ones which will have been discussed and debated internally so that only positive outcomes are shown outward.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

Full Reimbursement

As someone who was impacted, the onus should be with the protocol. The party responsible for the negligence and breach of trust should be liable, not the retail investors, else how would you establish trust?

Languages I speak and write: English

1052

Name (individual): Anclo

Wallet Address: anclo.eth

Tally Profile URL: anclo.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to?
DeFi development on Arbitrum
Improving Governance participation

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  • Against
  • No amendments. Cancel it.
    Centralization is the opposite of DAO. The greatest emphasis should be placed on the greatest possible participation of the community in the activities of the organization, including participation in voting. I want to avoid situations in which a small number of DAO participants (with the largest number of votes decided everything). The DAO should be the voice of the entire community involved in the system.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

  • Split Reimbursement
  • Of course, it is difficult to generalize about the return of hacked funds, because a lot depends on the specific situation - the reasons for the hack, the amount of losses, etc. A full refund should be preferred where it will not catastrophically impact the entire protocol and where the hack was not caused by team negligence.

Languages: I speak and write polish and learning english

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
I am certain that there are no conflicts of interest that would hinder me from carrying out my responsibilities effectively.

1053

Name (organization or individual)

Rodrigo Azevedo

Wallet Address or ENS

0x605e46032008eAd92CAb917Ccb39675927e36f30

Tally Profile URL:

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

  • I do not care about liquidity mining. Just build stuff that people NEED instead.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. For
  2. No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
  3. Initial equal and fair distribution between active participants, proving more power for useful for DAO actions. Strong DAO participants will be able to keep DAO healthy.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
In this situation, there are multiple parties which share the responsibilities for the loss of funds, hence a split re-imbursement will be ideal

Languages I speak and write:

  • English, Portuguese.

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

  • no conflicts of interest
1054

Name : huda (individual)

ENS : huda7077.eth

Tally Profile URL Tally | huda7077.eth

im most interested in contributing to: NFT development on Arbitrum & Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
eg — how aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the goal of the DAO?

The goals of a DAO can vary depending on the nature of the organization and its members. Generally speaking, DAOs are designed to facilitate decentralized decision-making and provide a transparent and equitable platform for members to participate in governance and decision-making.

Regarding NFT development on Arbitrum, it is a specific area of focus for your DAO. NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) are a type of digital asset that represent ownership or proof of authenticity of a unique item or piece of content. Arbitrum is a layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, designed to improve its performance and reduce transaction costs. By focusing on NFT development on Arbitrum, Our DAO may aim to leverage the benefits of both NFTs and Arbitrum to create new opportunities for creators and collectors in the digital art and collectibles space. This could include developing new platforms, applications, or tools to facilitate the creation, trade, and ownership of NFTs on Arbitrum.

Regarding liquidity mining, the aggressiveness of the strategy will depend on the DAO’s specific goals and risk tolerance. Liquidity mining involves incentivizing users to provide liquidity to a decentralized exchange (DEX) by offering rewards in the form of cryptocurrency tokens. While it can help boost liquidity and trading volume, it also carries some risks, such as impermanent loss and potential token price volatility.

The DAO should carefully consider its liquidity mining strategy and evaluate the potential benefits and risks before deciding on the level of aggressiveness. It may be beneficial to start with a more conservative approach and gradually increase the rewards as the liquidity on the DEX grows. Additionally, the DAO should be transparent in its decision-making and communicate any changes in strategy to its members.

Sample Voting Issue 1:
How would you vote?

  • Against

What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

  • If I were to propose an amendment to the proposal, it would be to increase the representation of other analytics service providers on the allocation committee and the oversight committee. This would provide more diversity of thought and perspectives and reduce the likelihood of a centralized power dynamic.

How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

  • Regarding the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done, it’s essential to strike a balance between the two. Decentralized platforms like Uniswap prioritize decentralization and community governance, and any proposal that undermines these principles should be approached with caution. While it’s crucial to get things done, it shouldn’t come at the expense of decentralization and community governance. A transparent and balanced decision-making process is crucial for the long-term sustainability of any decentralized platform.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Full Reimbursement: If the hack was caused by a fault in the protocol, and the platform is responsible for the loss. Additionally, if the funds involved are significant and the hack was widespread, full reimbursement could help restore trust in the platform and prevent further loss. But, the decision to reimburse affected parties should be based on a careful evaluation of the situation, and a clear understanding of the root cause of the hack. Additionally, platforms should have clear guidelines in place to handle such incidents, and users should be aware of the risks involved in using decentralized platforms.

Languages I speak and write: English

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest: -

1056

Name (organization or individual)
Killof(individual)
Wallet Address or ENS
0x90bd2EDE95E288ef0A1CD362c07E57671A181981

Tally Profile URL (create a profile here 10.1k)

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

Gaming development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
eg — how aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the goal of the DAO?
Please share your stance on issues that were raised previously, in other communities, as described below:

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview 1.2k

Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.
For instance, Flipside had 3/7 seats on the allocation committee and 1/3 seats on the Oversight committee. There was also concern since none of the other analytics service providers were involved in the proposal.
This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.
Prompts to Answer:

How would you vote?
For

What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

The proposal would need to be considerate of the value driven vs the allocation.

How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview:
It depends entirely where the reimbursement would come from. If this were a case of introducing a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reminting into the damaged parties’ accounts, I would vote yes. If the tokenholders and other network participants were to pay for this, no. Socializing losses across a large number of people is not acceptable when it is clear that very small circles of people are responsible for both insecure code and stealing the moneys.

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.

Prompts to Answer:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

Split Reimbursement

1057

DxSale.Network
0x47BAcf935066b802EAA0067eC14AB035B24eB78b
Tally Profile
Interested in Tooling and DeFi development - we are already live on arbitrum since it’s inception and plan to launch new tools - platform

Liquidity mining is a good approach, but it needs to be vested accordingly with the community needs in mind. I think allowing projects and products who are building tools on arbitrum, to be delegators is very important to the long term success of arbitrum. DxSale.Network has always supported L1s and will continue to do so in the future.

  1. For

  2. Being a validator shouldn’t be an invite-only but anyone should be able to create a validator but have a minimum stake also involved to ensure quality of upkeep.

  3. Every DAO, include dxsale, had such challenges. We solved it by limiting the barriers to entry where ever possible, until there were better guidances from central authorities that needs to be tackled.

  4. split reimbursement

Languages I speak and write - English

1058

Hi my name is Soragin and involved into crypto since 2017 Here is my response

Name: Martijn van Ooijen
Wallet address: 0xe8ae80b6bB509B5bF9371a53Fb32c5aa42B11912

Area of interest: I am particularly interested in supporting infrastructure development and improving decentralization of the protocol.

Position on DAO’s overall goals: I believe that DAO should take a balanced approach in pursuing its goals, prioritizing the security and sustainability of the platform.

negative feedback is worth a lot , it gives direction to new ideas

1059

Name (organization or individual)

  • Kien

Wallet Address or ENS

  • 0x76fd8187601ba5d2490316ceb8abf953931afee1

**Tally Profile URL

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

  • I do not care about liquidity mining. Bribing people to use X means X is useless. We aggressively build stuff that people NEED instead.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Against
  2. No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
  3. The solution is reputational avatars , which solves most if not all DAO participation and token-weight voting problems.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
It depends entirely where the reimbursement would come from. If this were a case of introducing a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reminting into the damaged parties’ accounts, I would vote yes. If the tokenholders and other network participants were to pay for this, no. Socializing losses across a large number of people is not acceptable when it is clear that very small circles of people are responsible for both insecure code and stealing the money.

Languages I speak and write:

  • English, Vietnamese,

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

  • no conflicts of interest
1061

Name (organization or individual)

  • Alexey Kravchenko

Wallet Address or ENS

  • 0x37d768C8FC5A0F54754A6bDB8b8469e6fF8CaD07

Tally Profile URL (create a profile here )

  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

  • I do not care about liquidity mining. Bribing people to use X means X is useless. We aggressively build stuff that people NEED instead.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Against
  2. No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
  3. The solution is reputational avatars , which solves most if not all DAO participation and token-weight voting problems.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
It depends entirely where the reimbursement would come from. If this were a case of introducing a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reminting into the damaged parties’ accounts, I would vote yes. If the tokenholders and other network participants were to pay for this, no. Socializing losses across a large number of people is not acceptable when it is clear that very small circles of people are responsible for both insecure code and stealing the money.

Languages I speak and write:

  • English, Croatian, Interslavic, German.

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

  • no conflicts of interest
1062

xxxnathan0708 - twitter
0x01B2E7C7768d2A58eB721FD32c6718bA3F053A15

Liquidity mining is a popular strategy used by DAOs to incentivize liquidity providers and reward community members for contributing to the platform. The aggressiveness of liquidity mining can depend on a DAO’s goals and risk tolerance. A more aggressive approach to liquidity mining may lead to faster growth, but it may also increase volatility and risk.

Previous issues raised in other communities can vary widely, but some common ones include concerns about transparency, governance, and security. DAOs can address these issues by implementing transparent decision-making processes, strong security protocols, and community-driven governance structures.

Overall, the goals of a DAO and the approach to liquidity mining should be aligned with the needs and priorities of its community. DAOs can benefit from incorporating feedback and input from community members to ensure that their strategies and goals reflect the values and interests of the wider ecosystem.

1.For
2.Nothing more
3.The tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done is a common challenge for any organization, including DAOs. On one hand, centralization of authority can provide clear leadership and decision-making, leading to faster execution and more efficient use of resources. On the other hand, too much centralization can stifle innovation, limit participation, and lead to decision-making that does not reflect the needs and priorities of the wider community.

  1. Full Reimbursement
    Imma speak on Eng and Russian a bit
1064

Name: Chris
Wallet: 0xEccD7127eD5C291FB1e91EF5aa62113d30769345
Tally URL: Tally | squirre1radio.eth
Interested in: All areas are interesting but most of all: Defi Development on Arbitrum, Improving Governance participation

Sample 1: I think we need to have a fair community that is decentralized. Flipside should not have had the control they had and I’m glad the DAO made the right decision. I would vote against Flipside in that case.
I would propose we ensure that we look at activity and other factors to ensure one whale can’t buy the votes.
I think if you have a strong community and reward participation it isn’t hard to walk that line and get input from the community to ensure we stay the course.

Sample 2:

  1. Full Reimbursement
    No conflicts of interest, and I am pleased the community is so open and transparent to creating a fair environment for the community.
    I only speak english
    [/quote]
1065

Name (organization or individual) webOfTrust

Wallet Address or ENS 0x1de2A056508E0D0dd88A88f1f5cdf9cfa510795c

*Tally Profile URL Tally | hailvitalik.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

  • Public Goods funding
  • Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
There are couple of important open topic a DAO could focus in current stage:-

  1. Decentralization of sequencer
  2. Open and transparent about rule, policy and development
  3. Knowledge sharing
  4. Inclusive to projects, idea and
  5. Focus on long term sustainable goal rather than putting too much focus on number go up
  6. Give equal priority towards building tool and infra as compare to increasing tvl

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. How would you vote?
    For

As of now, in purely token based DAO, centralization will continue to happen but we can try to overcome this having accountability in place. One person holding relatively high power is necessarily not a bad thing as long as they are transparent, rational for voting is clear and community can held them accountable for their action.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

  1. Split Reimbursement
    Please elaborate on what instances you believe it is right to refund and which are not.
    Reward the community for their contribution but making them full could lead us to bad precedence
    .
    Languages I speak and write: EN, DE

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
I dont represent an project or organization so no conflict but I am active delegate at Optimsm and Starknet.

1066

[quote=“Lemma, post:1, topic:31”]
Please respond to the submission template below by replying with your answers.

Name (organization or individual) Jessie

Wallet Address or ENS 0x5F631106d756569F1C930F3e8eE242731De167fF

**Tally Profile URL ** Tally | 0x5F63...67fF

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

  • Public Goods funding
  • DeFi development on Arbitrum

**My stance for that DAOs should there for everyone with equal opportunities and open source for research and building and development of the ecosystem.

Languages i speak English and hindi

1067

Name Andrey (individual)

Wallet Address 0x4888b872C5911Eb868D5B334302A58Bf54Dbc58B

Tally Profile URL (Tally | Connect Account))

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Gaming development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

  • I do not care about liquidity mining. Bribing people to use X means X is useless. We aggressively build stuff that people NEED instead.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Against
  2. No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
  3. The solution is , which solves most if not all DAO participation and token-weight voting problems.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
It depends entirely where the reimbursement would come from. If this were a case of introducing a self-executable on-chain transfer block on the hacked amount and reminting into the damaged parties’ accounts, I would vote yes. If the tokenholders and other network participants were to pay for this, no. Socializing losses across a large number of people is not acceptable when it is clear that very small circles of people are responsible for both insecure code and stealing the money.

Languages I speak and write:

  • English, Ukraine.

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

  • no conflicts of interest
1068

Name: Kamolkiet kasa

Tally: Tally | Kasa

Areas of interest:

  • Public goods funding
  • DeFi development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
First and foremost, the purpose of a DAO is to allow for the healthy and decentralised development of the rollup.

Sample Voting Issue 1

Sample Voting Issue 2

Languages I speak and write - English

1069

Name (organization or individual): kamolkiet kasa
Wallet address or ENS: 0xdb00B5D22Bbf207B3f4e6F11D34E47c6648E81CC
Tally Profile Tally | Kasa

What area are you most interested in contributing to? select up to two tags:

Improve participation in governance
Support infrastructure
IRL Arbitrum Community Meetings

how aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the purpose of the DAO?

I think that in the best of many cases, it is best to apply incentives to different protocols, maybe like Polygon, which has brought a variety of uses to its network, indirectly incentivizing its usability and ecosystem.

Example of voting question 1:

How would you vote?
Against

What amendments would you make to the proposal, if any?
Diversity of participants and opinions should be the main goal of the DAO, if a small group centralizes power, the name of the DAO is only an aggregate.

Something that can help is to predetermine the formation of committees at the beginning and demarcate the members it should have by increasing diversity against self-interest.

Languages I speak and write: thai