Delegate Statement Template

Governance Delegate Statements
,
143

Larva (The founder of ANDAO)

0x5f38BB373dccB91AD9Fd3727C2b9BaF6DF9332D3 (Larvandweb3.eth)

Tally | larvandweb3.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:

NFT development on Arbitrum

Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

This is a very broad question. My experience as the founder of ANDAO has taught me that DAOs are not only different from companies, but also different from communities. We often equate DAO with the community. Actually, it is not. The community is just a subordinate concept to a DAO, which is a community governance organization that eschews the centralized governance ways of a company. Therefore, governance is very important for DAOs. Lack of proper governance rules, then DAO can’t be called DAO, but only, community. So I think the ultimate goal of DAO is to explore a set of community governance rules that work, and to implement and protect all the rules through blockchain technology.

Please share your stance on issues that were raised previously, in other communities, as described below:

Sample Voting Issue 1:

Prompts to Answer:

How would you vote?

For! We are still in the very early days of DAO, so centralization and centralization of power are inevitable, and it will take us a decade or even decades to perfect the general rules of DAO. So don’t think about completely decentralizing all at once, that’s unrealistic and not necessarily good for the community and users.

What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

Nope.

How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?
Embrace decentralization, but don’t be afraid of temporary centralization. Whether it’s a company, a DAO, or a community, a job requires one person to do it, and a task requires one person to complete it. So as long as we keep it open and transparent, and write the rights and obligations of the executors clearly inside the governance rules, this is not a problem. Giving proper incentives to the executors and having someone responsible for monitoring is a good rule.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

Prompts to Answer:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

Full Reimbursement
For general users, they join crypto mainly for profit. So protecting the safety of users’ money is the most important and basic thing. No matter how good we do in other aspects, if we can’t protect the safety of users’ money, then we are doomed to fail. That’s why full Reimbursement is necessary.

Languages I speak and write:
Chinese, & English

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
I should be the person who cares most about the interests of Arbitrum other than the core team members of Arbitrum lol. All you need to do is look at the profile of ANDAO. ANDAO is a fun DAO on arbitrum purely run by donations and live for nearly two years. Our vision is to help all Arbitrum startup projects to build their initial community since we deeply know things are hardest at the beginning.

9 Likes
144

Name (organization or individual) : alertcat (Individual)

Wallet Address or ENS : alertcat.eth

Tally Profile URL : Tally | alertcat.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

DeFi development on Arbitrum

NFT development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
In my opinion, the primary goal of the DAO should be to enhance liquidity mining effectiveness while maintaining decentralization, safeguarding member rights, and promoting sustainable development of the project. We should actively expand liquidity mining operations, ensuring fair competition and transparency, in order to attract more users to participate and increase the value of the project.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Against

  2. No amendments, just cancel it altogether.

  3. Consider these condensed strategies:

  • Foster collaboration and consensus-based decision-making.

  • Assign clear roles and responsibilities.

  • Implement governance mechanisms like voting and multi-signature contracts.

  • Establish checks and balances to distribute authority.

  • Embrace transparency in decision-making and communication.

  • Regularly reassess the balance between centralization and efficiency.

  • Leverage technology and automation to streamline operations.

  • Encourage a diverse and inclusive community.

  • Provide education and resources for informed decision-making.

  • Be willing to iterate and adapt the DAO’s structure as needed.

    By implementing these strategies, a DAO can achieve efficiency without compromising decentralization and community involvement.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
I choose option 3: Split Reimbursement. This approach balances the needs of affected users, financial sustainability, and security improvement for the DAO.

Reasoning:

  1. Shared responsibility between developers and users.

  2. Maintain the DAO’s financial sustainability.

  3. Incentivize security improvements.

  4. Refund appropriateness depends on the circumstances:

  • Appropriate: DAO or project team negligence.

  • Not appropriate: User disregard for warnings or risky behavior.

    A split reimbursement fairly addresses the issue while considering the DAO’s long-term prospects.

Languages I speak and write: English and Chinese

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
I am assured that there are no existing conflicts of interest that would hinder my ability to carry out my responsibilities in the most effective and optimal way.

3 Likes
145

name : eduar
billetera: 0xABeA9F0cB817b3D8fb12f14C56b4a9A2D2f17BCA
tally;Tally | Eduar

Comparta su postura sobre los objetivos generales de la DAO: Particularmente me gusta la minería de liquidez para ayudar a crecer los proyecto con aporte de valor y además crear un ecosistema sustentable

¿A qué área estás más interesado en contribuir?
Desarrollo de NFT en Arbitrum

3 Likes
146

Ray*

** 0x73D65229727b23A0e25A2A85ed9f7e9789E8de2F**

Ray_7

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:

  • Public Goods funding
  • Improving Governance Participation

The goals of the DAO should reflect that of the community. This means an ever evolving and changes system to meet the needs of the community that supports it. It’s broad, but it’s important to remain connected and evolve with the community.

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

  • Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.
  • For instance, Flipside had 3/7 seats on the allocation committee and 1/3 seats on the Oversight committee. There was also concern since none of the other analytics service providers were involved in the proposal.
  • This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.

Prompts to Answer:

  1. How would you vote?
    For
  2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any? None
  3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?
    It’s important to have clear leadership but also to not have power centralized in one location. Having members voted in a “board of trustees” with short terms that overlap one another could be a potential solution, with also a challenge to the board for any potential issues. You could also have board assistant who are trained to investigate and bring issues to the board to minimize the amount of noise so they can be as effective as possible.
    Sample Voting Issue 2:
    Issue Overview:
    Overview Link 1
    Overview Link 2

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.

Prompts to Answer:

Appropriately assess and verify the parties damaged as possible to assess for appropriate reparations. It’s impossible to make everyone involved happy but properly analyzing the community affected shows care for the community and wins trust.

Full Reimbursement

English and a little bit of Afrikkans

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
I have no conflicts of interest

3 Likes
147

Hi folks - it’s Flipside Crypto here :wave:

@Arbitrum wrote about us in the Sample Voting Example #1. Since then we’ve learned a lot and invested in Governance directly, creating a full-time team dedicated to the subject.

We now run delegation across 11 protocols & DAOs.

Today, we are excited to share our learnings and add Arbitrum to the list:

Name (organization or individual)

  • Flipside Crypto

Wallet Address or ENS

  • flipsidecrypto.eth

Tally Profile URL (create a profile here )

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

  • Improving Governance participation
  • Public Goods funding

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

We aim to create an ecosystem which is fair, open, and expansive - activating the growing community and technology which is unique to Arbitrum.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Abstain - we were directly involved in the vote.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

  1. Split reimbursement - while we do not think this reflects the most fair outcome, it considers the results of each vote and restores trust in users.

  2. DAOs must evaluate decisions with the end user in mind. By ignoring their needs, it deters future revenue streams and customer bases.

Languages we speak and write:

  • English, German

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

We are delegates for other DAOs and L2s, including Optimism.

6 Likes
148

Name (organization or individual)

  • Trinh Kien

Wallet Address or ENS

  • 0xe00bb580fE45Bc373CB8Fb9183e0a0B21b4C548e

Tally Profile URL (create a profile here )

What area are you most interested in contributing to?

  • Defi exchange development on Arbitrum

  • Improving Governance participation

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

  • It’s helpful I think so. I think it will be a lot of work to improve the DAO

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Against

  2. If have any amendments, I want to know and I will think about it at that time. Now I have no idea.

  3. I have no idea.

Sample Voting Issue 2:

If the wallet is related to illegal activities you do not need Reimbursement If it is legal I think you should Split Reimbursement with interest rate and duration to do it appropriately (in a short time like 1, or 3 years.

Languages I speak and write:

  • English, Japan, Vietnam.

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

  • no conflicts of interest
3 Likes
149

Ihor
0x514671e0E21Ce4A30E302bF654C1A580fE9EdFF1
Tally :Tally | Connect Account

  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Gaming development on Arbitrum
    Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
    The DAO can solve problems by implementing transparent solutions, community-driven security protocols, and structural governance.
    Sample Voting Issue 1:
  1. How would you vote?

Against

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Depends on where the refunds come from.
If token holders pay, then no.
Языки, на которых я говорю и пишу: Russian and not much English.
No conflict of interest

2 Likes
150

Name : Nguyen Dang Duoc (Individual)
Address 0x5EFd95cED49055f9f2d945a459DEBFcCEE33aa54
Tally: Tally | Daniel Nguyen

  1. Curently my top interests are:
  • NFT development on Arbitrum
    -Gaming development on Arbitrum

  1. My stance on overall goals for the DAOs:
    The definite goal of DAO is always decentralization. The incentive of getting rewards by DAOs always comes from liquidity mining but it’s a high risk strategy.
    The goal of liquidity mining is to rewards but at a good ratio and it should be aligned with the needs and priorities of the member of community.

  2. Voting 1:
    *FOR
    *No amendments, just support that you should do it with a reasonable ratio
    *For any organization, including DAOs, the trade-off between centralization of authority and the capacity to accomplish tasks is a common challenge. One way that centralization of power can speed up execution and make better use of resources is by establishing clear leadership and decision-making. However, excessive centralization can stifle innovation, curtail participation, and result in decisions that don’t take the needs and priorities of the larger community into account.

  3. Voting 2:
    Full reimburstrment because we need guaranteed trust

  4. Languages I speak and write: Vietnamese (mother tongue) and English

5 Likes
151

Name: Eric li
Wallet Address
Tally Profile URL: N/A

Areas of interest:
DeFi development on Arbitrum and supporting infrastructure.

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
As a member of the community, my stance is to support the overall goals of the DAO in fostering the growth and development of the Arbitrum ecosystem. Specifically, I believe that a focus on DeFi development on Arbitrum, as well as supporting infrastructure, are key areas for achieving this goal. Additionally, I believe that it’s important to prioritize public goods funding and improving protocol decentralization to ensure that the ecosystem is sustainable and resilient in the long term. Ultimately, I believe that the success of the DAO depends on active participation and collaboration from the community, and I am committed to contributing in any way that I can.

4 Likes
152

Name (organization or individual) Ceazor’s Snack Sandwich

Wallet Address or ENS ceazor.eth

Tally Profile URL Tally | ceazor.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • Improving Governance participation
  • IRL Arbitrum community gatherings

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
I believe strongly in the education factor of adoption. Defi is the bloodline of any chain and what creates the opportunity for niche uses to thrive and grow.

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

  • Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.
  • For instance, Flipside had 3/7 seats on the allocation committee and 1/3 seats on the Oversight committee. There was also concern since none of the other analytics service providers were involved in the proposal.
  • This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.

Prompts to Answer:

  1. How would you vote?

Against

  1. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

Flipside would need to be sufficiently decentralized and have a proper DAO framework to be even considered for this level of power over such a large project.

  1. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

There are great examples of both fully decentralized DAOs, and their ability to filter and fasttrack development, but there are also great examples of centralized teams that get things done and are able to have the agility to develop fast.

In the growth phase of a project agility is important to sustain growth, but as the gov tokens disperse, they should aim to hand the keys over to a DAO.

putting the tag DAO on the name doesn’t cover this. The keys need to be burnt, or given to the DAO.

At the protocol level, “chain” it is much more important that as the project level.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview:
Overview Link 1
Overview Link 2

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.

Prompts to Answer:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

  1. Full Reimbursement

If the initial vote had passed, and there were no issue with the voting, ie quorum was achieved, there was no votign power exploits, the 1st vote should have been honored.

Languages I speak and write: English

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
Diversity of opinions is critical to making progress and determining the future direction of the
Arbitrum ecosystem. We recognize and celebrate the fact that delegates will have diverse views and we both encourage and anticipate good-faith debates in the governance process. That being said, it’s critical that all featured delegates are operating with Arbitrum’s best interest in mind, so please affirm that you don’t have any conflicts of interest that would prevent you from using your best judgement to operate in the best interests of advancing the Arbitrum ecosystem.

6 Likes
153

Name: BARDIA (Individual)
ENS: Barad.eth
Tally: Tally | barad.eth

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:

  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Gaming development on Arbitrum

Areas of interest:

  • Public goods funding
  • DeFi development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

My name is Bardia, and I’m a ARBITRUM Maxi.

About two years ago, I discovered Arbitrum and have been deeply immersed in its ecosystem since then
In addition, I am a self-taught developer who is interested in contributing to all ecosystem projects. For about a year, I have been following the Arbitrum closely, and I hope that it continues to grow and decentralize.
Although I lack DAO governance experience, I would be honored to have the opportunity to contribute to Arbitru’s decision making and governance.
I don’t have any conflicts of interest, and I will vote on every proposal unbiasedly.

8 Likes
154

Name: Ankit
Tally: Tally | 0xaFd2...797B

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up tot wo tags:**

  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Gaming development on Arbitrum

Considering the market scenario and the booming gaming industry

Areas of interest:

  • Public goods funding
  • DeFi development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

My name is Ankit, and I’m a Ethereum L2 solution=ARBITRUM FAN ! !

I don’t have any conflicts of interest, and I will vote on every proposal unbiasedly.

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
In my opinion, the primary goal of the DAO should be to enhance liquidity mining effectiveness while maintaining decentralization, safeguarding member rights, and promoting sustainable development of the project. We should actively expand liquidity mining operations, ensuring fair competition and transparency, in order to attract more users to participate and increase the value of the project.

Sample Voting Issue 1:

  1. Against
  2. No amendments, just cancel it altogether.
  3. Consider these condensed strategies:
  • Foster collaboration and consensus-based decision-making.
  • Assign clear roles and responsibilities.
  • Implement governance mechanisms like voting and multi-signature contracts.
  • Establish checks and balances to distribute authority.
  • Embrace transparency in decision-making and communication.
  • Regularly reassess the balance between centralization and efficiency.
  • Leverage technology and automation to streamline operations.
  • Encourage a diverse and inclusive community.
  • Provide education and resources for informed decision-making.
  • Be willing to iterate and adapt the DAO’s structure as needed.By implementing these strategies, a DAO can achieve efficiency without compromising decentralization and community involvement.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
I choose option 3: Split Reimbursement. This approach balances the needs of affected users, financial sustainability, and security improvement for the DAO.

Reasoning:

  1. Shared responsibility between developers and users.
  2. Maintain the DAO’s financial sustainability.
  3. Incentivize security improvements.
  4. Refund appropriateness depends on the circumstances:
  • Appropriate: DAO or project team negligence.
  • Not appropriate: User disregard for warnings or risky behavior.A split reimbursement fairly addresses the issue while considering the DAO’s long-term prospects.

Languages I speak and write: English and Chinese

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
I am assured that there are no existing conflicts of interest that would hinder my ability to carry out my responsibilities in the most effective and optimal way.

3 Likes
155

Name: kingdamieth ( Twitter )

ENS: 0x29Cf75F4622DbEDBC63354E28f6E734635690F4B

Tally: Tally | 0x29Cf...0F4B

Areas of interest:

  • Public goods funding
  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • Gaming development on Arbitrum
  • Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization
    Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO
    A DAO, or Decentralized Autonomous Organization operates based on smart contracts and runs on a blockchain. Its members can make decisions and manage the organization’s assets through a consensus mechanism.
    I am not the biggest fan of liquidity mining, at least not directly from a DAO; I think that in the best of many cases the best is to apply to different protocols that kind of incentives, maybe like Optimism that brought diverse uses to its network incentivizing it in an indirect way in usability and ecosystem.
    Sample Voting issue 1 :
  1. Against
  2. No amendments
  3. The tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done is an important consideration in any organization, including a DAO. On the one hand, a centralized authority can make decisions quickly and efficiently, but it can also lead to potential abuses of power and lack of transparency. On the other hand, a decentralized approach can lead to more transparency and democratic decision-making, but it may also lead to slower decision-making processes and inefficiencies.
    4.Sample voting issue 2*
  4. Split Reimbursement
    Split reimbursement can help to streamline the reimbursement process and reduce the administrative burden of managing shared expenses

Languages I speak and write: English

4 Likes
156

[quote=“Fiz, post:26, topic:31, full:true”]

Hi,

Name : Minh Nguyen
Wallet Address or ENS: 0x5eb0856B08E47b6299f917e7F594b96b297af805 & (taskearn.eth)
Tally Profile URL: (Tally | taskearn.eth)

Area of interest: I am particularly interested in supporting “Gaming development on Arbitrum”

Position on DAO’s overall goals:
The overall goals of a DAO can vary widely depending on the nature of the organization and the objectives of its members. Some DAOs focus on investing in blockchain projects, while others may prioritize social impact, governance, or even art. Ultimately, the goal of a DAO is to provide a decentralized platform for its members to collaborate and achieve their shared objectives without relying on traditional centralized systems.

Some potential overall goals for a DAO could include:

  1. Financial returns: DAOs may focus on investing in blockchain projects or cryptocurrencies with the aim of generating financial returns for their members.
  2. Governance: DAOs can provide a platform for decentralized decision-making, where members have a say in how the organization is run and what projects to pursue.
  3. Social impact: DAOs can also prioritize social impact by supporting initiatives that align with their values and mission.
  4. Innovation: DAOs can be a hub for innovation, where members can collaborate on new ideas and technologies, and experiment with new business models.

Ultimately, the overall goals of a DAO will depend on the interests and values of its members, and how they choose to use the decentralized platform to achieve their objectives.

4 Likes
157

Name: CaPig
Wallet: 0xaff74e2b82a63a6a9fc5a7f7c6c9633bfbe68fde
Ens: capig2912.eth
What area are you most interested in contributing to?

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • NFT development on Arbitrum
  • Gaming development on Arbitrum
    Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
    eg — how aggressive should we be in liquidity mining, what is the goal of the DAO?
    Please share your stance on issues that were raised previously, in other communities, as described below:
    Sample Voting Issue 1:
    How would you vote?
  • For
  • The tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done is a common challenge for any organization, including DAOs. On one hand, centralization of authority can provide clear leadership and decision-making, leading to faster execution and more efficient use of resources.
    Sample Voting Issue 2:
  • Currently, I am spending most of my time working on the para swap DAO. This means that I will automatically abstain from any discussion that might involve DEX Aggregation, as my opinion will obviously be biased. The positive side of this participation is that ParaSwap is also deployed in Arbitrum, which means that the success of Arbitrum will also positively impact Para Swap (through increased liquidity sources and volumes), as well as vice versa (by encouraging efficiency and decentralization of liquidity in the rollup by aggregating all of these together through a single, simple to access interface).
6 Likes
158

**Name Wasique Ali

**ENS: Wasique.eth

**Tally Profile URL Tally | wasique.eth

I am a developer and would like to develop on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
As DAO allow decentralisation and i do understand how decenterlised networks works. So ill be able to help community and vote for right suggestions.

5 Likes
159

Penn Blockchain (FranklinDAO) Delegate Profile

Introduction

Areas interested In: Improving Governance Participation, Tooling & Improving Protocol Decentralization and Community

Overview
Hello everyone! We’re Penn Blockchain/FranklinDAO a leading, completely student run blockchain organization with students from The University of Pennsylvania’s undergraduate and graduate schools. We have over 300 general body members and are expecting many more in the semesters to come!

We have committees covering Governance, Research, Education, Investments, and Development/Web3. On the governance side of things, our team has different members leading governance initiatives for different protocols we have delegations for. Current Penn Blockchain delegations include Aave, Compound, Uniswap, DyDx, Optimism, Maker, etc. Each week, governance leads will share updates with the club about new proposals and we will all debate about what to do before voting with our wallet.

Core Values
We are deeply committed to preserving defi’s core values, and will gear our voting decisions based on:

  1. Transparency: Committed to ensuring transparency of the protocol, and transparency about our decision-making process. We are committed to acting independently without external influence from third-parties. We’re always open to answering questions related to our votes on proposals, and will have a running thread up shortly to publicly display our opinions on votes.

  2. Sustainability: We are committed to ensuring the long term sustainability and health of the DAOs we participate in and aim to help them steward their native protocols in perpetuity.

  3. Inclusivity: Forging the best ideas requires diversity, fairness, and education, and we will strive to encourage these.

We’d love to be your Arbitrum delegate as many of us have been closely following the chain for a while now. Our weekly discussions combine graduates with years of expertise in many jurisdictions with many bright minded undergrads eager to leave their impact and names in Web3. We have upheld a 95%+ participation rate across all the other protocols we are delegates for and plan to spend a lot of time here as well to help build out the ecosystem!

Sample Voting Issue: Flipside/Uniswap

  • For
  • Would vote to have funding come across different tranches, and have a clear and fair indication and process for committee elections
  • We think both can be done in an efficient manner at the same time usually. In times where this tradeoff is needed, we will evaluate by a case by case basis but tend on the side of transparency and openness to the community.

Languages I (we) Speak and Write: English, Spanish, Chinese, German, etc.

Conflicts of Interest

  • We take part actively in the governance of other well known projects
5 Likes
160

Name (organization or individual)
MusclePump
Wallet Address or ENS
MusclePump.ETH
Tally Profile URL (create a profile here)

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • Supporting Infrastructure

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
DAO should maintain the ecosystem of rug pulls, scams, hacks, Pump n Dump and Let the good Wild wild West times roll… Degens for life

Please share your stance on issues that were raised previously, in other communities, as described below:

Sample Voting Issue 1:
Issue Overview

  • Uniswap planned to use Flipside to attract new users to Uniswap through bounties. Although the program outline and funding was fine, the proposal was contentious because it gave Flipside crypto too much control over allocating UNI to bounties and oversight of the entire program.
  • For instance, Flipside had 3/7 seats on the allocation committee and 1/3 seats on the Oversight committee. There was also concern since none of the other analytics service providers were involved in the proposal.
  • This proposal flew under the radar but at the 11th hour got very heated. Large votes from university clubs supported the proposal since they would get a seat on the allocation committee. However, Dune and Leshner spoke up about the issue because of the centralization of power and favor of one service provider.

Prompts to Answer:

  1. How would you vote?
    For
    Against

  2. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

  3. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

  4. Against, Fuck big parties and centralization

  5. Less power, dilute the seats and add more degens

  6. oversight

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview:
Overview Link 1
Overview Link 2

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.

Prompts to Answer:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

  1. Full Reimbursement

  2. No Reimbursement

  3. Split Reimbursement
    Please elaborate on what instances you believe it is right to refund and which are not.

  4. No reimbursement… Our fault, your loss… suck it up

Languages I speak and write:

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
Diversity of opinions is critical to making progress and determining the future direction of the
Arbitrum ecosystem. We recognize and celebrate the fact that delegates will have diverse views and we both encourage and anticipate good-faith debates in the governance process. That being said, it’s critical that all featured delegates are operating with Arbitrum’s best interest in mind, so please affirm that you don’t have any conflicts of interest that would prevent you from using your best judgement to operate in the best interests of advancing the Arbitrum ecosystem.

sure

2 Likes
161

Name: sisyphus

Wallet: 0xe8C0Fe3699dB673486C391A4eEfA5a18c7CFD4d6

Tally: Tally | byroot

Areas of interest:

  • Public goods funding
  • DeFi development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
First and foremost, the purpose of a DAO is to allow for the healthy and decentralised development of the rollup. Community-managed When enacting anything through governance, it is important to consider: How will this impact the long-term sustainability of the

Sample Voting Issue 1

Sample Voting Issue 2

Languages I speak and write: By order of preference - English, chinese

2 Likes
162

kseniya_ya_da - twitter
0x01390192E7C025730A4426B12aF78C23a548E10A
Tally | Tednet0 - 0x01390192e7c025730a4426b12af78c23a548e10a
Im most interested in Supporting Infrastructure and NFT development on Arbitrum

Liquidity mining is a popular strategy used by DAOs to incentivize liquidity providers and reward community members for contributing to the platform. The aggressiveness of liquidity mining can depend on a DAO’s goals and risk tolerance. A more aggressive approach to liquidity mining may lead to faster growth, but it may also increase volatility and risk.

Previous issues raised in other communities can vary widely, but some common ones include concerns about transparency, governance, and security. DAOs can address these issues by implementing transparent decision-making processes, strong security protocols, and community-driven governance structures.

Overall, the goals of a DAO and the approach to liquidity mining should be aligned with the needs and priorities of its community. DAOs can benefit from incorporating feedback and input from community members to ensure that their strategies and goals reflect the values and interests of the wider ecosystem.

1.For
2.Nothing more
3.The tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done is a common challenge for any organization, including DAOs. On one hand, centralization of authority can provide clear leadership and decision-making, leading to faster execution and more efficient use of resources. On the other hand, too much centralization can stifle innovation, limit participation, and lead to decision-making that does not reflect the needs and priorities of the wider community.

3 Likes