DZack23.eth Delegate Communications thread

[dzack23]

[Off-chain] Voted FOR AIP Fast Feed, a simple (only changes off-chain Sequencer messaging layer, no DAO on-chain upgrade required) way for the DAO to indirectly benefit off of MEV demand. Will be curious to see how 24 hour price updates (intuitively this feels high) plays out in the market.

[Constitutional] AIP Fast Feed

Fast Feed: Constitutional AIP Abstract This Constitutional AIP proposes to establish the Fast Feed, a paid, authenticated data streaming product for Arbitrum One. The Fast Feed allows subscribers to get updates on transactions, their relative ordering, and related transaction metadata earlier than they would otherwise via the regular feed. The Fast Feed makes that stream accessible to Arbitrum’s ecosystem as a specialized, subscription-based data product. This feed will be paid-only to mitigate…

[dzack23]

OAT election vote distribution:
50% Max Lomu
25% AJ Warner
25% Patrick McCorry

AJ and Patrick have both demonstrated their capabilities in this whole and via their other roles re their Arbitrum DAO. Max Lomu would be a new member, who I believe would be a strong addition and hope the OAT team will consider him for inclusion as one of the additional elected members.

Snapshot

[dzack23]

[Off-chain] Voted ABSTAIN on Ratification of Security Council Election Process Improvements:

[Constitutional] AIP: Ratification of Security Council Election Process Improvements

Voting ABSTAIN My views remain the same since I outlined them here, but given that I’m now a member of the Security Council (along with my current delegation weight), I opt to abstain to avoid any conflict of interest (particularly with respect to the term extension improvement).

[dzack23]

On-chain: Voted FOR ArbOS 61 Elara

[Constitutional] AIP: ArbOS 61 Elara

Voted FOR Verified actions here; confirmed that upgrade updates ArbOS and adds base fee manager contract on both Arb One and Nova.

[dzack23]

On-chain [Constitutional] AIP: Security Council Election Process Improvements

Voted ABSTAIN; rationale given on snapshot vote.

Action contract checked with proposal decoder here:

[dzack23]

[On-chain] Voted in favor of combined fast-feed PGA proposals.

Proposal decoded, rationales in discussion threads

[dzack23]

[Off-chain] Voted FOR continuing Arbitrum Security Program, which has successfully executed its mandate and continued to involve with accelerating AI technology.

Arbitrum Security Program

Arbitrum Security Program Abstract The Arbitrum Foundation proposes to continue and evolve the Arbitrum Audit Program (AAP) - launched on 1 August 2025 with a one-year mandate - into a broader Arbitrum Security Program (ASP), running for a further 12 months on a rolling-application basis. From “Audit” to “Security”. AAP delivered on its original purpose - real vulnerabilities surfaced and remediated before mainnet, with a high share of net-new teams brought to Arbitrum - and demonstrated wher…

[dzack23]

[Off-chain] Voted FOR in all three proposals to ban Good Entry, Limitless, and APX Finance (respectively) from the Arbitrum DAO.

Banning projects identified in the high-severity Watchdog Program cases

While I haven’t reviewed the Watchdog report myself, I believe the lack of public response from Good Entry, Limitless, and APX Finance (as of posting this we’re three days past the deadline) is sufficient reason to vote FOR the ban on all three.