Zeptimus.eth
About me: Transparency and accountability advocate. A passionate representative focused on decentralized governance.
Diving into Arbitrum because traditional governance is broke and I believe I can have a positive impact here. I’m excited to be part of a system that pushes our boundaries, prioritizes community agency, and rewards genuine problem-solving.
Been deep in Web3, working on how we fund and support public goods. I’d love to make building public goods as competitive and exciting as any startup hustle.
I love healthy and fair competition and having clear rules is necessary to keep each other accountable. Thats why im so fired up about creating unbiased governance with AI agents.
We need to work together and keep AI open source. If we don’t, we’re basically selling our future to big tech.
When I’m not breaking down DAO structures, I’m either taking hits in Muay Thai, playing calisthenics or finding my flow on a snowboard.
1 Like
[Tally] Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0
I’m voting for this one. RWA is trending, and funny enough, just today ETH dropped to $2,170 on Binance, and MANTRA, the top RWA coin, is up 14% while all the alts dropped hard as well. I’m citing this as an argument to support the proposal. I also believe that with boomers joining the party, this will keep going up.
Why would I hold these papers with all those legal bureaucracies just to say a house is mine? I believe RWA is a needed tech for the cryptoanarchist dream I believe we are moving towards.
I don’t like the idea of selling ARB, especially without a plan to buy back, but voting yes because I believe it’s good to capture this value.
OpCo: A DAO-adjacent Entity for Strategy Execution
I voted NO because I believe DAOs should operate with the minimum structure necessary. We need to stay as decentralized as possible, allowing initiatives to grow organically and enabling the community to swarm toward the ultimate goal of increasing ARB’s value by showing growth within our ecosystem.
Additionally, while not the sole reason for my vote, I’d like to point out that the proposal lacks clear execution details, such as how OpCo will be structured, how leadership will be chosen, and what mechanisms will ensure alignment with DAO governance.
[Snapshot] Approve the Nova Fee Sweep Action
I’m voting FOR this proposal. It make sense to send the ETH where it can be managed. Im also supportive of comments of using the eth to get yield .
[Tally] Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3
Questbook has been doing a good job, it’s a great place for grantees to get onboarded on Arbitrum. The budget it’s growing but their asking is reasonable, they are allocating more funds to. Their ask is below 10% which is quite competitive in the space, lets see it grow and looking forward to season 3 results.
[Snapshot] Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget
Voting YES. The extra projects proposed here are solid - improving oracles, zk tech development tools, and other key infrastructure for Arbitrum. This is exactly the kind of strategic investment we need.
I like how transparent this request is - we can see exactly which projects would get funded and why. This sets a good precedent for how to ask for additional funding: show the community specific high-value projects that couldn’t make the initial cut.
I disagree with the sentiment to open this for new applications. We had a successful process, these are the overflow projects that scored high but couldn’t get funded due to budget constraints. Let’s keep it focused on these specific projects rather than opening a new funding round. After seeing the results of the project as a whole we can re-evaluate it.