Voting For. Glad to see RARI introduce more users flow into arb ecosystem.
1 Like
That was a wise decision. The adoption of this proposal also allows to see more possibilities.
1 Like
The FranklinDAO / Penn Blockchain Team voted FOR this proposal. Happy to see the questions about this being a Constitutional AIP answered by @cliffton.eth, appreciate your help. Like @JoJo mentioned, we would support a future proposal that streamlines this process for ERC20 tokens that have given up ownership but want to be supported by the Arbitrum Native Bridge.
1 Like
rari is a good model in favour of the proposal.
It’s great to see the change in rari, and also to see this that technical architecture and pace that gives a model for many other projects for future multi-chain governance, and also if rari can provide more detailed solution with technical counselling, cost, etc. That for many protocols, can migrate to arb is also very simple and clear case.
1 Like
I support and vote in favor of this proposal. Echoing other comments in saying this could be streamlined process to onboard projects onto arbitrum. We often discuss user onboarding but rarely project onboarding processes.
1 Like
DAOplomats is voting FOR this proposal on Snapshot.
The RARI community upgrading their governance token gives them more control and flexibility. With a successful review by Openzepplin, we are in full support of this implementation on Arbitrum.
1 Like
Smart move, of course the L2 are naturally equipped with the superior qualification for Governance.
1 Like
We are in favor of the RARI token contract upgrade and the shift of its governance to the Arbitrum.
1 Like
Voted For: Happy to see RARI DAO moving their governance on Arbitrum. This could be a great case study for us for all future protocols or DAOs that decide the same.
1 Like
Voted for: Helping the RARI DAO to move governance to Arbitrum is a net benefit for both.
1 Like
We fully support this proposal once the technical checks and balances are complete.
We believe that this process should then be standardised to allow future DAO support for projects migrating from L1 to Arbitrum. As always, let’s make this experience as frictionless as possible.
1 Like
The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and @Nyx, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal.
As we said before, Lampros Labs DAO supports upgrading the RARI token contract and moving its governance to the Arbitrum ecosystem. We think this will help bring another community into Arbitrum, which is good for everyone.
It’s great to see that the Arbitrum Foundation has started a technical audit of the code that will make this happen. We still believe this will be good for both RARI DAO and Arbitrum DAO, and we’re looking forward to seeing how it all works out.
1 Like
We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot.
We maintain the support made in the comment before and appreciate RARI Foundation’s plan to offset the cost of bridging and implement potential incentives for its smoother transition.
1 Like
After consideration, the @SEEDgov delegation has decided to vote “FOR” on this proposal at the Snapshot vote.
Rationale
We see no reason not to support this proposal given that it is costless and beneficial for the Arbitrum ecosystem. Agree with @Castlecapital on the need for a standardized process for this kind of migrations.
1 Like
Voting “For”, always in support of anything that enhances the governance process. Especially at no cost to the DAO
Edit: To save space, editing comment to note that I do not have any change in my stance since the Snapshot vote. Will retain the “For” vote on Tally.
1 Like
I decided to vote FOR this proposal. It’s a no-brainer—no cost and tremendous potential value for the ecosystem.
2 Likes
We support the proposal to transition Rari’s governance to the Arbitrum ecosystem. This initiative aligns with the broader goals of enhancing governance accessibility and efficiency, while also contributing to the growth of the Arbitrum network by onboarding another active community. The proposed improvements, such as reduced gas costs and a more streamlined user experience, are also beneficial
Some reservations include the lack of details regarding the incentives for current RARI token holders on Ethereum to migrate to the Arbitrum ecosystem. While the proposal mentions that costs will be offset and further incentives are under consideration, a clear, comprehensive strategy for this transition would be beneficial. Addressing potential risks and providing a structured plan for encouraging holders to bridge their tokens would help mitigate any friction during this migration process.
The long-term benefits of this proposal outweigh the potential concerns, and we are in support of moving forward with this transition.
1 Like
I vote: yes.
Reason: I believe rari has become a leading decentralised protocol over the years, and by deploying tokens on the arb, it will better enable more users to hold and actively participate in governance. At the same time to many protocols to arb as a template. At the same time, we hope that rari will provide a complete strategy and path as a guideline case after the completion of rari.
1 Like
The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
We vote FOR this proposal in the temperature check and will vote for it when it comes to an onchain vote.
This proposal only asks the governance to exercise the governance power to adjust the configuration of Arbitrum bridge contracts to allow a smooth transition of RARI tokens from L1 to L2. We are happy to see such an initiative and fully support it.
We also think it would be a good idea to discuss how such configuration changes should be handled in the future. At the moment they require a full constitutional vote, just like ArbOS upgrades. If the direction set by RARI is to be followed by other projects, we would probably need a better way to adjust the configuration that does not require a full governance vote. Perhaps we could use the non-emergency Security Council to do this after the proposal has passed the temperature check, or have a separate mechanism that allows an external body (similar to MSS) to adjust these parameters with some additional safeguards.
2 Likes
We’re voting FOR the Rari governance transition to Arbitrum. This move strategically positions Rari at the forefront of L2 governance innovation. It potentially unlocks wider participation and more agile decision-making for the protocol.
The proposal’s focus on reducing transaction costs and improving UX addresses key pain points in current governance models. However, the success hinges on effective migration incentives, which need further elaboration.
This transition could serve as a blueprint for other protocols considering similar moves. To streamline future processes, we recommend exploring more efficient mechanisms for handling bridge contract configurations, possibly leveraging existing Arbitrum governance structures.
1 Like