The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Tally voting.
The role of long-term contributors in a DAO is evolving, and this proposal is part of that shift. We see Entropy stepping into a more formal, structured role, not just supporting specific proposals, but helping the DAO plan and adapt across multiple workstreams.
What matters to us is that this isn’t a passive renewal. The scope is bigger, expectations are higher, and Entropy will now operate alongside a growing execution layer through OpCo. That raises the bar for coordination, clarity, and delivery, and we think that’s a good thing.
We’ve had a chance to observe Entropy’s approach over the past year, being in touch wherever required, and what stands out is their consistency. Even in areas where outcomes were uncertain, they’ve stayed engaged, taken feedback, and helped push things forward. That level of reliability is rare in decentralized environments.
We’re supporting this proposal with a few expectations in mind. First, we believe it’s important that a clear division of responsibilities between Entropy and OpCo is established early to avoid confusion. Second, the value delivered should be regularly communicated in plain terms so delegates can stay informed. And third, incentive structures should remain tied to meaningful output, rather than just time spent or general presence.
We wish the Entropy team the best as they step into this next phase, and we look forward to seeing the DAO continue to evolve with stronger long-term contributors in place.