Panda Partners program supporting the proposal
Rationale
1、in terms of eth security and the developer community as a whole, is conducive to active participation in the entire ETH ecosystem
2, should enhance Arbitrum’s position as a leader in the evm ecosystem.
Suggestions:
1、The initial amount is not easy to be too much, and is decided according to the effect after the feedback of the activity.
Just reaffirmed my vote by voting ‘FOR’ on Tally. As I mentioned before: investing in security is never too costly, it’s essential if we want a secure protocol. This proposal shows our strong commitment for security in the ecosystem.
gm, voting FOR on Tally.
The request is reasonable for a bounty on Ethereum - can’t understate how critical its security is for us. Glad Arbitrum can do its part.
I like that any unused funds will be used for an audit contest focused on securing the Pecta hardfork.
Proposals worthy of support 
1. Support the direction of the proposal: ArbitrumDAO sponsoring Attackathon helps both Ether and Arbitrum security. Ether’s security directly affects Arbitrum, so it’s a win-win.
2. Clear goals and transparency: The proposal has clear targets for the number of participants and the number of reports, and there will be regular reports to the community, so transparency is good.
3. Funding allocation: Immunefi waived fees and ensured that all funds were used to reward security researchers, which was good. And it makes sense that the remaining funds are used to support other auditing programs.
Suggestions:
1-. more AMA or community discussions could be organized so that more people can participate and understand the progress.
2-the education component was well done, and it is recommended to find ways to expand the impact of this to more security researchers.
We will continue to support the panda tier option on Tally, as previously supported during the Snapshot stage. The recent Security Council intervention demonstrates that the Arbitrum DAO’s mission should include a commitment to maintaining the highest level of security for the entire ecosystem.
Voting FOR this proposal on Tally for the reasons shared when temp-check voting happened.
voting For the current onchain proposal because I believe Arbitrum should contribute to the security of the Ethereum ecosystem and Immunefi is the defacto platform for security bug bounties. This “Attackathon” event is something we should do much more of, in this space.
Voted in favor. During the snapshot phase I wasn’t fully convinced of some aspects, mainly linked to the actual benefits of this initiative. However, the introduction of clear outcome metrics to evaluate the impact of participation allows me to be more confident in this initiative. As I also mentioned in my voting rationale during the snapshot vote, I would have been more confident in this choice if other L2s decided to take part in the initiative too, but I hope that their participation can take place in future editions.
Will vote for, for everything that contributes to more security if its a reasonable cost.
After consideration, the @SEEDgov delegation has decided to “AGAINST” on this proposal at the Tally vote.
During the Snapshot vote we have provided feedback that has not been considered, therefore we have decided to vote against the proposal in Tally.
Gm, gm 
The results are in for the Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship on-chain proposal.
See how the community voted and more Arbitrum stats:
Voted For: Being included in the big events in the Ethereum ecosystem is important. It might be hard to calculate ROI on this kind of event, but overall I think we all benefit from it. Not only Arbitrum but crypto space in general. For the future, I think we at Arbitrum DAO need to develop some other kind of system for proposals like this. We don’t need to spend our governance time on each sponsorship request coming in like this.
Do you know the dates of this event?
I couldn’t find this information on the official websites.
I voted AGAINST for the same reason stated above.
I voted FOR the Panda Partners sponsorhip on Tally for the reasons outlined below.
The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
We are voting FOR this proposal after having supported the proposal for the ‘Panda Partners’ tier during temp-check for the same reasons outlined then.
DAOplomats is voting for this proposal on Tally.
We are maintaining our support from the temp check as our preferred option Panda Partners passed and is what is being proposed for onchain vote.
gTrade is in favor of the proposal. As Ethereum’s most active L2, it’s important that we contribute to supporting Ethereum’s security. Additionally, the amplification of Arbitrum’s support by the Ethereum Foundation will create a positive signal, highlighting Arbitrum’s alignment with Ethereum and commitment to its security.
We vote FOR the proposal on Tally.
We maintain our support from the Snapshot voting for the “Panda Partners” tier sponsorship of the event. We believe in the direct mission alignment between the Arbitrum ecosystem and the Attackathon and the donation amount is reasonable.
Voting FOR here.
As I support previously for Panda option. Let’s make it happen.