Tané Delegate Communication Thread

[Tane]

Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal seeks funding from the Arbitrum DAO to support the large-scale security audit event “Attackathon” hosted by the Ethereum Foundation and Immunefi. The event focuses on enhancing the security of the Ethereum protocol and consists of three main phases: education, bug hunting, and result evaluation. The proposal requests a sponsorship of 30 ETH from the Arbitrum DAO.

Voting and rationale:

Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain our support from the Snapshot voting for the “Panda Partners” tier sponsorship of the event. We believe in the direct mission alignment between the Arbitrum ecosystem and the Attackathon and the donation amount is reasonable.

[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal (Onchain)

Summary: Following the success of Phase I, the Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee (ADPC) proposes an extension into Phase II for a period of six months. This proposal details the achievements, lessons learned, and improvements from Phase I, and presents the specific activity plan and budget for Phase II.

Voting and rationale:

Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain our decision made at its Snapshot voting phase and appreciate the additional information added to the proposal. We also appreciate the future effort to make sure that there will be elections before the next phase of the committee with potential collaborations with Entropy and/or other suitable entities.

Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal aims to extend the delay of the L2 Core Time Lock in the Arbitrum DAO’s on-chain governance system from 3 days to 8 days. This will introduce an additional 5-day delay before an approved proposal is executed, specifically applying to actions related to on-chain upgrades and smart contract modifications.

Voting and rationale:

Constitutional - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain our stance made in the Snapshot phase and continue to support the change after having reviewed the report by the ARDC.

[Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget (Onchain)

Summary: This proposal requests 250 million ARB tokens to bolster the Arbitrum Foundation’s strategic partnerships budget, enabling it to pursue key partnerships that foster ecosystem growth and provide value to the Arbitrum DAO.

Voting and rationale:

[Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain the support made in the Snapshot phase and acknowledge that lack of transparency is largely due to the nature of partnership discussions and the protection for the competitive edge. We will review the special section dedicated to this partnership funds in the future transparency reports.

Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum (Onchain)

Summary: Proposal for Arbitrum DAO to register a custom gateway for RARI DAO’s upgraded L2 governance token, enabling RARI DAO to move its governance from Ethereum mainnet to the Arbitrum ecosystem, thereby enhancing governance efficiency, reducing user costs, and improving overall accessibility.

Voting and rationale:

Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain the support at the Snapshot stage and look forward to the transition of the RARI DAO governance onto Arbitrum with additional treatments like offsetting the cost of bridging and potential incentives for the transition.

ArbitrumDAO strategic “Off-site” (online) updated proposal (Onchain)

Summary: Proposal to allocate a budget of up to 35,266 ARB to host an online “Off-site” event aimed at enhancing communication and collaboration among Arbitrum token holders.

Voting and rationale:

Arbitrum Offsite format: online vs IRL

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. While we have some concerns about the quality of the executions and outcome from this initiative, we consider it worth a try to focus on aligning the DAO’s key members with the strategic directions that the DAO needs to tackle going forward.