As a delegate, I support the GovHack Core Series proposal, which is actionable and on the ground, with offline meetings that deepen ecological cohesion. A thousand times online is better than one face-to-face chat, before having a beer and talking about something COOL.
Proposals are strategic and long-term, bringing key stakeholders together for in-depth discussion and decision-making helps drive high-impact proposals and improve governance efficiency. By organising regular face-to-face high impact events. I’m glad you’ve come up with this proposal.
Of course I have some suggestions and questions
-
- broader engagement opportunities: while this proposal focuses on engagement with existing stakeholders, I recommend considering pathways for emerging contributors and community members to participate. By adding more online events or open discussion sessions throughout the year, it may be possible to better identify potential newcomers without diminishing the depth of the core strategy discussions, and of course it may be more interesting to be able to fund some of the very promising developers and projects to participate.
- Assessment of budget and activity effectiveness: The budget in the proposal is relatively large, especially as it relates to venues, logistics, and scholarships for each event. In order to ensure that the budget is reasonable, is it possible to provide a more detailed cost breakdown and performance evaluation mechanism? For example, through more specific cost-benefit analyses, it could be ensured that the use of resources for each event would achieve the intended strategic objectives and provide continuous support for the development of DAO.
Hard Work