The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
We’re voting AGAINST the proposal in the temperature check.
While we appreciate Klaus’s time and effort put into this, as well as the two prior GovHack proposals, we do not see the need to put together an additional event at this time. The reason why we believe this is because although GovHack in Denver and Brussels were decent, they did not deliver enough value for the DAO relevant to their cost.
That’s not necessarily HackHumanity’s or GovHack’s fault. The DAO might not be at a point/place where the value such events can deliver can be captured and lead to something actionable. The lack of follow-up after the events proved the above point.
Given that, we do not support putting together another event and spending DAO funds simply for the sake of having an event.