Date Voted: June 2, 2025
78. Proposal: Wind Down the MSS + Transfer Payment Responsibilities to the Arbitrum Foundation (Snapshot)
-
Vote: For
-
Rationale: I am voting yes on this proposal. I believe this is a timely and necessary step to avoid any more unnecessary waste.
Also, since the Foundation has already been involved in most of the checks and verifications (KYC, wallet info, recipient confirmation…), this proposal just formalizes what they have been doing. It’s not about giving more power to the AF.
The current MSS process is quite heavy and with signers in different timezones, signing transactions within 24 hours is almost impossible and not practical.
OpCo will soon take over managing the approvals, and they will have their own handover process. I think this proposal is just making that transition smoother and earlier.
AF has clear internal processes, experienced staff, and professional operations, so payments, handling errors, and communication will be faster and more efficient than with a scattered multisig group.
79. Proposal: Adjust the Voting Power of the Arbitrum Community Pool & Ratify the Agentic Governance Pivot (Snapshot)
-
Vote: B - Reduce delegation to 100K
-
Rationale: EH’s delegation has moved away from its original goal, and this is a lack of alignment that concerns me.
Reducing the delegation to 100K ARB is a careful and reasonable choice. It respects Event Horizon’s efforts so far but also addresses important concerns about transparency and accountability with the use of AI agents.
This smaller delegation keeps Event Horizon as a meaningful voice in governance without giving them too much influence. It also gives the DAO time to learn more about how the AI system works before trusting it with more voting power.
Check my feedback on the forum: