Ignas Delegate Communication Thread

Governance Delegate Statements
21

54. Proposal: Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget (Snapshot)

  • Date Voted: February 7, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: No more to add in my rationale. Voted yes on Snapshot. Stylus is key to keeping Arbitrum competitive, increasing the budget to fund more innovative projects makes sense :slight_smile:

    The 4M increase request is reasonable for long-term growth. I appreciate @Entropy’s effort despite the concern of doubling the budget.

    Check my feedback on this proposal here :slight_smile:

1 Like
22

55. Proposal: Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3 (Tally)

  • Date Voted: February 10, 2025
  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: After considering the forum discussion and Snapshot vote, I continue to support this proposal. Arbitrum can attract more creative projects, driving innovation, and growing the ecosystem in the long term.
23

56. Proposal: Arbitrum Growth Circles Event Proposal (Snapshot)

  • Date Voted: February 18, 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m voting against this proposal on Snapshot.

    I believe event benefits and KPIs should be tightly linked, but they feel disconnected here. For example:

  • Scalable support should answer how it reduces barriers. How many issues get resolved? How does the community self-support?

  • Measurable impact after an event such as how many builders onboard? How many sign-ups or clicks? Any growth in followers on X or other channels?

    Like other delegates, I also disagree with the budget since there’s no clear outcome commitment. More projects joining doesn’t mean they’ll stay or bring long-term value to Arbitrum :slight_smile:

    To me, the expected results feel too vague. Can’t say yes to this.