Rationale: Entropy Advisors has proven their value in Year 1 by driving execution, improving treasury transparency, and supporting key Arbitrum initiatives like DRIP, STEP, and data reporting.
Their focus on capital efficiency, incentive design, and strategic alignment is exactly what Arbitrum needs to scale as a sustainable, growth focused DAO.
Although the budget is quite large and reflects a ~20% increase from the previous term, the long term value and alignment justify the cost.
I support renewing their mandate to keep building momentum.
Rationale: Registering $BORING in the Arbitrum custom gateway is a technical step that enables seamless bridging for a project expanding to our ecosystem. It supports adoption, incurs no cost to the DAO, and follows established procedures.
Rationale: Support the extension and refinement of the Code of Conduct and DAO procedures.
This proposal brings clarity to situations, for example, member resignation or winding down initiatives, without imposing rigid changes to the Constitution.
It’s a thoughtful continuation of the initial trial that aligns with the DAO’s evolving needs, such as practical, flexible, and cost free.
Rationale: Vote yesI as this proposal will improve user safety and operational efficiency by deprecating the outdated USDT bridge.
The new USDT0 bridge is faster, more reliable, and already widely adopted. Disabling the legacy bridge reduces risk for both users and smart contracts while streamlining Arbitrum’s bridging infrastructure.
Consolidating these idle funds into a single strategic wallet under ATMC improves capital efficiency while keeping assets safe and under DAO governance.
This approach aligns with Arbitrum’s shift from a grant heavy model toward sustainable finance , using existing assets to generate long term yield.
By putting idle USDC to work, DAO can reduce reliance on selling ARB and strengthen its yield layer, all without adding risk or complexity.
It also makes sense to keep the 2025 Events Budget intact, with funds earning yield until needed for events.
This is a low risk, high upside treasury optimization that benefits DAO’s financial health and long term sustainability.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on Snapshot vote. Entropy Advisors has proven their value in Year 1 by driving execution, improving treasury transparency, and supporting key Arbitrum initiatives like DRIP, STEP, and data reporting.
Their focus on capital efficiency, incentive design, and strategic alignment is exactly what Arbitrum needs to scale as a sustainable, growth focused DAO.
Although the budget is quite large and reflects a ~20% increase from the previous term, the long term value and alignment justify the cost.
I support renewing their mandate to keep building momentum.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on snapshot vote. Registering $BORING in the Arbitrum custom gateway is a technical step that enables seamless bridging for a project expanding to our ecosystem. It supports adoption, incurs no cost to the DAO, and follows established procedures.
Rationale: Voted yes. This proposal removes inefficient subsidies on Nova, upgrades executors for smoother and safer governance, and disables the outdated USDT bridge to protect users. All three changes improve security and user safety.
Vote: Increase cohort duration - Reduce qualification threshold - Allow members to bypass Nominee - Allow candidates to rotate keys - Allow members to rotate keys
Revert the DIP to v1.5 I support all proposed changes.
Extending cohort duration reduces voter and candidate fatigue.
Lowering the qualification threshold encourages more candidates.
Allowing incumbents to bypass the Nominee phase saves voting power.
Key rotation for both candidates and members improves security and reduces unnecessary burden.
Overall, these updates make the election process more efficient, inclusive, and secure.
Vote: "Re-Calibrate for Future Council” and Allow Bonus for Current Council”
Rationale: The proposed benchmark adjustment and onetime startup bonus are fair given AGV’s strong performance and the workload during its launch phase.
These updates bring compensation closer to market standards, align incentives with ARB, and recognize the Council’s critical early contributions.
Rationale: Voting For supports a necessary technical improvement to Arbitrum’s governance.
Transitioning quorum to a Delegated Voting Power basis aligns participation thresholds with active governance engagement rather than total token supply.
Rationale: I’m abstaining from this temperature check.
While I appreciate the effort to design a more objective and automated DIP, this proposal still contains many open parameters and assumptions that need further discussion.
Rationale: I voted abstain because, while the program aims to incentivize delegates and contributors, many of its metrics are difficult to measure objectively, making it unclear how effective the incentives will be.
Rationale: I support this proposal to reduce gas spikes and make Arbitrum more stable for users. The new gas targets and adjustment windows should improve UX while maintaining network security.