Vote: DO NOT FUND
Type: Snapshot
Proposal link: LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding Selections
Voting Rationale Link:
Commenting on Proposal Link:
=== COMMENTING ON PROPOSAL: ===
This proposal’s intent to reward individual community members for their contributions to the LTIPP program is commendable, yet there are critical flaws in its execution. Retroactive funding without clear evaluation criteria or pre-established metrics makes it challenging to objectively assess each applicant’s impact. While rewarding valuable contributions is important, the lack of defined standards for measuring individual achievements risks creating a precedent of funding based on subjective judgments, which could undermine fairness and efficiency within the DAO’s governance processes.
Additionally, as some delegates have pointed out, existing programs already offer rewards for meaningful community engagement. Rather than duplicating these efforts, it may be more effective to consolidate or enhance current initiatives with measurable goals to ensure transparency and accountability. AVI could consider structured financial alignment strategies that integrate clearer KPIs, which would enable both the DAO and contributors to understand expectations and outcomes better.