Hello! Thanks for your proposal.
I have a few questions, as some items looks contradicting each other.
In the previous statement, you mention that Arbitrum needs to attract more builders and talent (I agree with that). And then you proceed with “Opening the possibility of future airdrops will be a solid move to do that, and bring users home.” (here, we disagree, but this will come later).
A few lines below, you wrote this:
Here, I have my questions:
- You proposed a date for the snapshot, so no new builders will benefit from the current proposal (if I got it right)?
- Is the first line meant to be read as the current airdrop will serve to attract new builders as they will hope that will receive a different airdrop that could happen in the future?
Regarding the execution:
I understand that framing such massive proposal is not a work to be done by one guy (as you mentioned in one of your replies). But in this proposal, you are already framing most of the relevant concepts for the incentives, leaving for this WG the execution of the strategy.
Airdrop as an incentive mechanism
(now the part we disagree) As we are talking about an incentive program, what makes you not consider the other ideas already proposed, like:
- Incentives WG
- @Entropy DRIP framework:
- And others that were discussed in the Detox period?
It seems more reasonable to follow a structured program with other metrics besides gas fees, for instance.
Thanks in advance!