First, the introduction of a retainer model for members seems like a positive step towards aligning incentives, but there is a risk that this could lead to inefficiencies if expectations regarding time and deliverables are not managed properly. I recommend implementing clear metrics to assess performance, which would strengthen accountability and maximize value for the DAO. Second, the inclusion of an Optimistic Governance Module is intriguing, but its implementation might require more clarity. How will bureaucratic bottlenecks be mitigated, and what will the veto process look like if proposals initially face no objections? I think this aspect needs more detail to ensure effectiveness in distributed governance environments.