[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] - Arbitrum Research and Development Collective [Term 2]

I vote FOR this proposal in Tally, because as I said before, the value provided by the ARDC was huge.

Glad to see this proposal on on-chain vote! I shared my thoughts in the snapshot because I really believe ongoing ARDC programs are crucial for strengthening our governance, security, and research. I also believe this will help Arbitrum have a professional financial management system.

Voting in favor for the same reasons that I mentioned at the temperature check phase [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] - Arbitrum Research and Development Collective [Term 2] - #56 by 0x_ultra

For Tally: voted in favour (same reasons as temp-check)

I voted FOR this proposal at the temp check and onchain stage. I think the first version of the ARDC was valuable in theory, but suffered from a lack of direction from the DAO. I am optimistic that this can be addressed in the next version by working more closely with the Foundation to map ARDC efforts to DAO initiatives.

I voted FOR this proposal on Tally, especially based on how well ARDC v1 performed with the STIP analysis. The proposed budget is the lowest among the choices that were listed in Snapshot, but Iā€™m sure the DAO could provide some additional funds (through a new proposal) if the need for that will arise.