Justification for every candidate:
(I treat all candidates with respect, but I have my own opinion on how the candidate will perform this work):
-
A.J. Warner (ajwarner90) - a worthy specialist. I would like the person to be independent from the Foundation. Formally, this is true, but there is also an advantage in the fact that Warner works at Offchain Labs - he will have more connections for operational work
-
Belmin Kalkan (0xRecruiter) - I believe that the DAO representative should be related to the DAO itself. But the only activity we see from this representative is an application for this position
-
Chris Cameron (PaperImperium) - this is my personal opinion, but since I was against this program due to the significant cost of organizational expenses. The candidate’s justification that OpCo will solve some problems that may appear in the future (and also replace the Foundation) did not suit me.
-
Edgar Prediger (EzR3aL) - it is also bad for me that the candidate voted for OpCo. His justification that a legal entity is needed to hire talented employees is strange, because for any position within the scope of responsibility of the DAO we have such people without this, take at least the Security Council
-
Federico Daffina - Analyst at Reverie, experience in finding, evaluating and supporting crypto companies and their founders at early stages. This is something that can help in assessing the work of OpCo and their understanding. Also, for me, a plus is the leadership against the creation of OpCo, which means that the candidate will be more attentive to the work of this organization, which is what DAO needs
-
Frisson (Frisson) is one of the most respected delegates and has done a lot for DAO. However, his opinion about the creation of OpCo has a negative effect on me. Of course, decentralization is a difficult structure to manage, but this is what we strive for, and OpCo is a step in the opposite direction
-
Jana Bertram (Janabe) - a representative of RARI, who is connected through the Obrit chain with Arbitrum. However, there has been almost no activity from her in DAO over the past few months, which means in my opinion she cannot fully represent DAO
-
Joseph Schiarizzi (cupojoseph) is a worthy candidate with extensive experience in crypto. I am confused by the fact that the candidate did not react to the creation of OpCo. I did not find any comments on this in the history
-
Marc Zeller (MarcZeller) - in my opinion, he spends very little time on DAO and has only a few posts in the last year. I would like to see the candidate have more involvement with DAO
-
Patrick McCorry (stonecoldpat) - no questions about professional skills, but I would like the DAO representative to be in no way connected with the Foundation, because in many ways the DAO strives for decentralization, and the Foundation does the opposite
-
Paul Imseih (Pablo) - almost never participates in forum discussions, only a few posts per year
-
Pedro Breuer (pedrob) - as I wrote earlier, I have a negative attitude towards the candidates who voted for this initiative. He doesn’t like the rationale that some additional organization will manage all initiatives and that it will be good. At the moment I don’t see a sufficient rationale for the need for such a company, but simply a waste of DAO funds