Let’s just say I have very strict definition of conflict of interest myself. For example, I think I’m still the only delegate that voluntarily discloses all his earnings from Arbitrum DAO. Also very strict, to the point of even recommending that @pedrob withdraws from the DIP if elected to the OAT because being paid by the DIP creates an inherent positive bias towards @SEEDGov, and since SeedGov is a service provider to the DAO, and eventually to the OpCo in the future, I think that bias shouldn’t be there for an OAT member.
But of course, as usual @krst, if you want the specific “hints of COI”, hit me up in the DMs. =)