Proposal: AGV Council Compensation Calibration: Benchmark for Next Term & Startup-Phase Bonus

Update on Current Bundled Snapshot Vote

Over the past few days, several delegates and community members have raised questions about the current AGV proposal vote, particularly around the bundled voting format and how options were presented.

While the proposal followed all DAO procedures, it has become clear that the structure has caused confusion for some delegates. This includes two confirmed instances of mis-voting, equating to over 9.6M ARB in voting power, under the outlined approval voting format. In these instances, delegates voted in approval of both None and another option, which skews the reliability of results.

Following feedback from DAO stakeholders, AGV has decided to withdraw the current Snapshot vote and repost the proposal in a clearer, separated format later this week.

This change affects presentation only, not the substance or intent of the proposal. By breaking the proposal into individual components, delegates will be able to assess and decide on each part independently, supporting more precise and transparent decision-making. The team will also review and consider the vote’s quorum requirements in line with the magnitude of the change, ensuring that votes reach an appropriate level of participation and consensus.

We appreciate the constructive feedback and engagement from various DAO stakeholders, who supported this reset as the clearest path forward. AGV remains committed to maintaining transparency, alignment with DAO governance standards, and a high level of care in how decisions are presented to the DAO.

A follow-up post will be shared shortly outlining the next steps and updated proposal structure.

Arbitrum Gaming Ventures (AGV) Team

2 Likes