I’m voting Abstain on the retroactive rewards
I value what the AGV is doing in finding strong potential candidates to lead the gaming efforts on Arbitrum. The thing is we are not there yet… competing for the gaming ecosystem is a huge opportunity, but not an easy task. I see the great work being done and want to acknowledge those efforts. Which is why I’m on the fence here, and won’t vote against.
I would support this for sure if the council showed a stronger long term commitment with longer vesting periods as @zeptimus mentioned in his comment on snapshot. Maybe 5 years with a 2 year cliff? 1 year seems like it will go by too fast.
OR, even better, would be KPI based vesting … like when one of the games you supported hits x revenue in on-chain fees… or something, then the ARB is released to you… That would be an easy one to support.