this is my wife’s wallet, from which she blogged in the mirror, had an active lens profile, to which the phaver, lenster, lenstube applications were tied, where she uploaded photos and personal videos. Gitcoin passport and donations in the last two rounds, snapshot votes, phi, ens and much more, everything is very difficult to evaluate - this is the period of life that inspired her. in order to attract in crypto, she motivated dozens of people to get a lens with a personal nickname and now they stole the lance and hope for an airdrop… now there is a bot on her wallet, I sent some on the bnb network and they immediately went to another wallet. I attach a screenshot with the latest interactions in all networks, after the claim there is a deposit of c phishing tokens from your distribution address and the next day the withdrawal of arb tokens to an unknown wallet and then the robbery of other networks, in the eth network they made a deposit for commissions of 0.013 eth
As I’ve explained before, this has nothing to do with the Arbitrum contracts. There’s a lot of ways in which that wallet could have gotten compromised. I know it’s frustrating, but the best thing you can do is learn from it and move on, I’ve posted a few suggestions on wallet security, I’ll leave it here too:
This topic was originally made with people that mistakenly made a transfer to the token address in mind and not for those that got hacked, since there’s not really a way to recover hacked assets. Again, I’m sorry for your loss and I hope you can soon recover from it.
tell me how to resist the bot installed on the wallet? if there are airdrops, will they go to the robbers? if so, then you need to do with such wallets so that projects do not send tokens to those who stole this activity, in the future, sponsoring scammers will negatively affect the entire industry. I saw wallets that stole tens of thousands of ARB tokens, if the owners of the wallets knew in advance where to turn to declare that the wallet was stolen, you would not send these tokens to those who should not own them, if the bot can be turned off or something also tell me how? I understand that nothing can be returned, but I do not want them to receive something else
Not really anything you can do, sadly. Since they have access to the private key, they have basically the same access to that wallet as you do.
As of preventing hacked wallets from receiving airdrops, it’s not as straightforward as one would want it to be, since even if you were to let a project know that that wallet is hacked, how could you prove it in a trustless way? Not really possible, in my opinion.
In general, the platform/system will not proactively fix or compensate for user operation errors unless it is of a particularly large scale. It is better to design a feature to prevent such situations from occurring.
with regards to this wallet, you can refer to personal photos in lens and a Gitcoin passport with linked social networks, you can also use brightID there are various ways of possible proof, these hackers are now hunting not only for assets, but also for promising transactions. you can think of ways to prevent the prosperity of these robbers
i mean it’s in the interests of web3
personally, if I would claim awards in any projects in the future from this wallet, I would rather refuse awards and not give them to robbers who will sell all our time spent at once at any price
Good one there for the team. but my little suggesting is i think the team should involve some of the delegate by sending some a token form the airdrop distribution too. i belive it not everyone that got the airdrop from the team here!
Thank you very much.
It would be great if you could give us some concrete and clear instructions on what actions we should take next. What should we do to check the temperature? Also, should we change the title?
Please arbitrum Foundation team Return funds to arb users who sent their airdrop tokens to the contract address, please make a Google form for solve this problem
I want to understand why you see the need to reply to all suggestions/proposals and comments but seem to always be against what the proposal is about, If you answers are always against why don’t you write it once and let it be? But, you keep on giving comments but in a pessimistic way, with all due respect, you aren’t helping matters at all, if you are not an executive member of the foundation or be in favor to the proposals or just be here since as I have figured also you were also not affected by the mishap then I strongly suggest you keep your opinions to Yourself, respectfully please. Thank you
I’ve mostly answered to people that have made baseless accusations regarding the claim contracts, and also tried to educate people on what could have happened to them and what is and what is not possible.
The point of having a governance forum is to hear different opinions on proposals, not to have an echo chamber. Since OP, 90% of replies haven’t been productive at all and it’s mostly been one-liners or spam-like messages.
I’ve made a suggestion myself on how this issue could be resolved (bellow) and would support a proposal that’s rightly and realistically argued.
I’ll always try to help and educate people if I feel I can help and if I feel like sharing my opinion on anything, I’ll do just that, but thank you for your suggestion.
We put together a reference implementation of what the upgrade to the Arbitrum contract could look like here: GitHub - empyrealapp/AIP-2
Using unstructured storage in the contract upgrade will prevent clutter and make it easier to remove this update after a period of time. Please share feedback if you have time.
I think it’s also interesting to view this a low risk upgrade to the Arbitrum token that will help to establish the methodology for future modifications. I think this is a great opportunity for the community to drive the actual code controlling the Arbitrum token. If the community supports it, it can and will happen.
For example, what would the review process be for upgrades? How should the smart contract changes be organized to facilitate code reviews? There’s a lot of small points like this that are worth discussing in more general terms than just this AIP.
If it is technically possible to implement this, it would be in the interests of the DAO’s members to execute this.
Not just on the Arbitrum network, but some users have also sent ETH to the Arbitrum Address on L1/Ethereum Chain. To this, Chris Co from Arbitrum Labs had replied that they were looking into a solution.
Pls arbitrum Foundation You don’t need a large staff to do this, and it won’t put a lot of pressure on the team,I AM VERY SURE ARBITRUM CAN RETURN THE TOKEN ASAP.