Wait until AD claim is over (I believe that will be sometime in September)*
Put op a DAO vote so that token holders at that point decide if they want the team to implement the following idea or leave the tokens as they are
If DAO agrees:
Take a snapshot of all the wallets that made a tx to both the distributor and the token contracts
Unify all the ARB tokens in DAO multisig
Deploy a fork of the distributor contract, with the snapshotted addresses and amounts (10% deducted**)
Transfer 90% of recoverable tokens to new distributor contract
Open a new claim for said addresses for a pre-determined amount of time (3 months maybe?)
Unclaimed tokens will be transferred back to DAO multisig
*I believe this would avoid having people making the same mistake even after the solution is implemented.
**The DAO would keep 10% of all recovered tokens to compensate for manpower, gas fees, etc. which will be kept in DAO multisig.
I’d appreciate input on this, specially from OP @Welly and from other people that have imo made good points in the thread (mentioned bellow), but everyone is of course welcome to reply with suggestions/alternatives
please arbitrum foundation, just return the tokens that have been sent to the contract address to the sender according to the foam transaction checked at arbiscan explorer, it’s very easy
Yeah, sounds like this would be easy to do, but also IME people will always inevitably send funds to the contract address. So if you are going to address it now, you will end up addressing it again. Perhaps once a year we allow users a two week period to submit a claim to recover funds sent to contract and then they are all processed? Because this won’t be the last time it happens.
hi, on Friday, Arbitrum Disocrd was hacked by Robot and made an announcement with fake link, some people clicked into the link and lost a lot of money, I suggest these people also get refund. They are the victim, and I was one of the victims.
The beneficiaries of this proposal are not only the users involved in the airdrop incident, but all users. The feature of decentralized products should not be “you have to bear all your own mistakes”. On the contrary, this is a weakness. We should strive to optimize the user experience as much as possible, correct obvious and solvable “mistakes” in a timely manner, in order to optimize the overall user environment of decentralized products.
Because that may be the subject of this proposal for deletion.
We would like the DAO to open a form for us.
We need to figure out how many addresses we have sent incorrectly as we do and see how much effort it calls for from the Foundation.
I am convinced that returning tokens will increase decentralization
After I received the ARB from the project’s wallet to my wallet, for some reason maybe I did something wrong, I didn’t receive the ARB on the exchange. Upon review I discovered my ARB was sent back to the project wallet. Please help me so I can get my ARB number. Thank you very much. Here is my wallet and transaction history. 0x38c4066143d809E876eACA3F7cd910F3a7526F40
I see posts about losing assets due to hacking, but this proposal is about the issue of sending tokens to the contract address, as the title says. This is a different issue from hacking. It should not be posted here in the proposal.
This should be voted . I personally checked the address 3 times. I wanted to send to my binance account. Checked wallet address 3 times. After i sent the transaction i checked 30 minutes later and in Binance nothing arrived. I talked with binance and after checking on ARB Scan i saw tokens were sent to ARbitrum foundation…It really sucks if these things happen
