Entropy ranked our vote in the following manner:
- Keep the Current Version (v1.7)
- Sunset the DIP
- Abstain
- Revert the DIP back to v1.5
When Entropy initially voted in support of v1.5 almost a year ago, we were hopeful that a subjective program would be a step forward from the more basic v1.1. However, the new program unquestionably caused an uptick in spam, redundant AI-generated responses, and less impactful contributions. While both were/are far from perfect, v1.6 and v1.7 helped reduce the incentive for this type of behavior. Reverting back to v1.5 or sunsetting the program entirely would be, in our opinion, more disruptive than productive. To shift the conversation, we encourage the Arbitrum Foundation and SeedGov to publish the 2.0 version of DIP as soon as possible so that delegates can begin giving consideration to what a revamped program entails, its objectives, and if it is cost-effective for the DAO.
Lastly, we would like to extend credit to the SeedGov team for their professionalism in managing the DIP thus far. Delegate compensation is understandably a complex and sensitive topic for those involved in the program. Their team took on a very difficult task, and their proactiveness in making iterations should be viewed as a testament to their dedication to providing the best possible program for the DAO. In all of our engagements together, SeedGov has been a competent actor and thoughtful voice. The DAO is lucky to have their continued involvement.