Tané Delegate Communication Thread

[Tane]

Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum (Snapshot)

Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum

We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. As a temp-check, we are in support of the general direction that the DAO should take for the treasury management. We are grateful of the extensive involvement from Karpatkey and Gauntlet. We don’t necessarily agree with the requirement that the DAO needs to set up a RFP for multiple service providers to apply for; With the reasonable proposal to kick start the important functions of the DAO, the DAO should practically choose the currently available and best…

Should the DAO Create COI & Self Voting Policies? (Snapshot)

Should the DAO Create COI & Self Voting Policies?

We vote FOR: Disclosure Policy and FOR: Responsible Voting Policy. No doubt the DAO should implement a disclosure policy at least. On top of that, we believe the Responsible Voting Policy is best suited for the current DAO voting situation as we see it working well in the Optimism for some of its election votings. As Frisson said, ideally the DAO proposals should be passed even with abstains from delegates who have conflicts with them, but practically it’s too early to implement Strict Self-Vot…

[Tane]

Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship (Snapshot)

Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship

We vote “Panda Partners”, “Against”, “Abstain”, and “Unicorns Partner”. We would basically vote for “Panda Partners” that would give reasonable support to the initiative that contributes to the Arbitrum ecosystem as a whole.

[Tane]

[Constitutional] Extend Delay on L2Time Lock (Snapshot)

Constitutional - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock

We vote For the proposal at its Snapshot phase. We believe the benefits of extending the L2 Core Time Lock delay should outweigh the downside described in the proposal and it’s reasonable as this change wouldn’t affect proposals that merely transfer funds from the treasury. We would review the planned check by the ARDC Security member before its onchain vote.

STIP-Bridge Operational Budget (Snapshot)

STIP-Bridge Operational Budget

We vote For the proposal on Snapshot. The budget was already approved and the distributions of it proposed by Alex makes sense, thus no reason to be against it. We appreciate all the contributors who are experienced in the process of LTIPP and other initiatives are compensated for their work for STIP-Bridge operations.

[Tane]

Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon (Tally) and [Replace Oversight Committee with MSS] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon (Snapshot)

Delegate to a public access, public good citizen enfranchisement pool through Event Horizon

We voted FOR the proposal for the MSS amendment to the original proposal and the main onchain proposal on Tally. We believe this is an interesting experiment to encourage small size token holders to get involved in the governance in a meaningful way and a good way of utilizing the treasury to contribute to the voting situations. Delegating the operations to the Arbitrum MSS also makes sense.

[Tane]

Fund the Stylus Sprint (Snapshot)

[RFC] Fund The Stylus Sprint

We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We believe Stylus is an ambitious, yet reasonable innovation that Offchain Labs has developed to make Arbitrum even more attractive to Rust and C++ developers and it’s important to generate momentum of its use within the developer community to have attractive applications and toolings on the Arbitrum ecosystem, thus the program like this is timely, crucial and much needed. We also agree that having an Evaluation Committee is selected by the program manager…

Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum (Snapshot)

Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum

We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We maintain the support made in the comment before and appreciate RARI Foundation’s plan to offset the cost of bridging and implement potential incentives for its smoother transition.

ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee Phase II (Snapshot)

Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal

We vote Yes - Extend for the proposal on Snapshot. We appreciate all the work and comprehensive report provided for the Phase I and continuous effort to be made by the experienced actors in the area. However, we echo the concerns by other delegates on bigger scopes and higher compensations to each party (2.5x from the one in Phase I). Also, the detailed breakdown of the budget, especially the below part should be explicitly clarified in the proposal. On the election, it makes sense to keep th…

[Pyth Network] Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request (Snapshot)

[RFC] Pyth Network Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request

We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot. While the request itself seems totally valid and we expressed the support, we have resolved to respect the decision made with the Incentives Detox period (which hasn’t started yet but in effect soon) and we believe all the extension requests should be treated the same. We apologize for the wrong signal made before realizing the Detox is in effect for the extension.

Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request (Snapshot)

[RFC] Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request

We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot. While the request itself seems totally valid, we respect the decision made with the Incentives Detox period (which hasn’t started yet but in effect soon) and we believe all the extension requests should be treated the same.