Tané Delegate Communication Thread

[Tane]

Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum

Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum

We maintain the vote on its Snapshot and vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We appreciate all the effort by the contributors for the past 6 months and believe in the needs to focus more on building strong ecosystem in the gaming category. There are obviously a few concerns that were already discussed in the thread and the X Space held today, but we are confident that the appointed GCP council, GCP team and Foundation incorporate feedback from the DAO and advisors and appropriately oversee the prog…

ArbitrumDAO Contribution; Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights

Proposal [Non-Constitutional]: Defending Open Source: A United Stand for Developer Rights and Software Freedom

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintained our Snapshot vote to fund 500k ARB each as we are generally supportive of the initiative and consider it important for the Arbitrum DAO to contribute to the cause.

Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal

Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintained the vote from Snapshot as we believe increasing the threshold to 9/12 is the vital first step to improve the system to achieve the revised Stage1 designation.

Election of STEP Program Manager

STEP Program Manager Applications

We vote 50% for Steakhouse and 50% for Avantgarde. We chose Stakehouse because their extensive experience and track record stand out quite a bit. We believe the higher fee is justified with the outcomes that they should be able to bring. We also chose Avantgarde because of their expertises and their balanced fee structure. We believe both entities should be able to offer great services as the first Arbitrum STEP Program Manager.

[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative

[Non-Constitutional] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Venture Initiative

We vote FOR [NO IRL Event]. We appreciate the AVI team’s effort and approach to address feedback from the delegates. While we still believe potential overlap would be found through the course and as DAO, we need to evaluate if this initiative should be prioritized and funded in a big scale after the pilot phase, the budget ask is reasonable enough for a capable and passionate team to start the pilot phase to explore the opportunities.

AIP: BoLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum

AIP: BOLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum

We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. BoLD unlocks permissionless validations for the Arbitrum chains, which is a great step for the DAO and a technological feat provided by Offchain Labs. While we need to review the economical incentive that is also sustainable for a more diversified set of operators to join in the future, we are in 100% support of the proposal and implementation of it as it stands.

AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Bond sentiment and AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Operational cost sentiment

AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator

We vote FOR the two proposals related to funding the first BoLD validator on Snapshot. Regarding bond funding, it makes sense to support the Foundation to bootstrap the first BoLD validator as the trusted and honest party. It’s also great to confirm that the Foundation will equip themselves with a team of operators running a node with help from Offchain Labs. Regarding operational cost subsidizing, it makes sense to subsidize the first operator running the BoLD validator and cover the operatio…